Choice of approach for appendicectomy: A meta-analysis of open versus Laparoscopic appendicectomy

被引:111
作者
Bennett, John [1 ]
Boddy, Alex [1 ]
Rhodes, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Upper GI surg, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
关键词
open appendicectomy; laparoscopic appendicectomy; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0b013e318058a117
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although laparoscopic appendicectomy has been performed since 1983, the optimal approach for appendicectomy is still under debate. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials between 1995 and 2006 was undertaken. Studies were analyzed overall and in 2 subgroups (pre-2000 and post-2000) to examine for changes in outcomes with increased laparoscopic experience. Operation time was significantly longer for laparoscopy and hospital stay was shorter. Operating time reduced markedly for laparoscopy on subgroup analysis. The risks of postoperative ileus and wound infection are lower for laparoscopy. Perhaps paradoxically, tile risk of intra-abdominal abscess development is significantly raised with laparoscopy with ail odds ratio of 2.26 (P = 0.0002). Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe and effective method or treating acute appendicitis. This meta-analysis shows improvement in the outcomes of laparoscopy with increasing laparoscopic experience but open surgery appears to still confer benefits, especially in terms of intra-abdominal abscess incidence.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 255
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Al-Mulhim AS, 2002, SAUDI MED J, V23, P1339
[2]  
Bruwer F, 2003, S AFR J SURG, V41, P82
[3]   Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [J].
Cox, MR ;
McCall, JL ;
Toouli, J ;
Padbury, RTA ;
Wilson, TG ;
Wattchow, DA ;
Langcake, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (03) :263-266
[4]   Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain [J].
Decadt, B ;
Sussman, L ;
Lewis, MPN ;
Secker, A ;
Cohen, L ;
Rogers, C ;
Patel, A ;
Rhodes, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (11) :1383-1386
[5]   Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients [J].
Enochsson, L ;
Hellberg, A ;
Rudberg, C ;
Fenyö, G ;
Gudbjartson, T ;
Kullman, E ;
Ringqvist, I ;
Sörensen, S ;
Wenner, J .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (04) :387-392
[6]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial [J].
Hansen, JB ;
Smithers, BM ;
Schache, D ;
Wall, DR ;
Miller, BJ ;
Menzies, BL .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (01) :17-21
[7]  
HANSEN JB, 1996, WORLD J SURG, V20, P21
[8]  
Hart R, 1996, CAN J SURG, V39, P457
[9]   Cost-effective appendectomy - Open or laparoscopic? a prospective randomized study [J].
Heikkinen, TJ ;
Haukipuro, K ;
Hulkko, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (10) :1204-1208
[10]   Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy [J].
Hellberg, A ;
Rudberg, C ;
Kullman, E ;
Enochsson, L ;
Fenyö, G ;
Graffner, H ;
Hallerbäck, B ;
Johansson, B ;
Anderberg, B ;
Wenner, J ;
Ringqvist, I ;
Sörensen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) :48-53