Extreme parity and the risk of stillbirth

被引:27
作者
Aliyu, MH
Salihu, HM
Keith, LG
Ehiri, JE
Islam, MA
Jolly, PE
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000165825.65203.69
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We examined the relationship between extreme parity and risk for stillbirth in the United States. Methods: Singleton deliveries at 20 weeks of gestation or later in the United States from 1989 through 2000 were analyzed. Risk for stillbirth in women with 1-4 (moderate parity, category 1), 5-9 thigh parity, category 11), 10-14 (very high parity, category 111), and 15 or more (extremely high parity, category IV) prior live births were computed using logistic regression. Results: Overall, 27,069,385 births, including 1,206 to extremely high parity mothers, were analyzed. Of the 81,386 stillbirths, 71,623 (2.8/1,000), 9,206 (5.0/1,000), 531 (14.4/1,000), and 26 (21.6/1,000) cases occurred among category 1, category 11, category 111, and category IV gravidas, respectively. With category I as referent category, the odds ratio for stillbirth increased consistently with ascending parity after adjusting for potential confounders: category II (odds ratio vertical bar OR vertical bar 1.05, 95% confidence interval vertical bar Cl vertical bar 1.02-1.07), category III (OR 1.97, 951% Cl 1.81-2.15), and category IV (OR 2.31, 950% Cl 1.56-3.42) (P for trend < .001). Among extremely high parity women (category IV), the odds ratio for stillbirth also increased with unit increment in the number of prior live births: 15 (OR 2.72, 95% Cl 1.29-5.74), 16 (OR 3.14, 95(/o Cl 1.17-8.41), 17 (OR 6.11, 95% Cl 2.56-16.5), and 18 or more prior live births (OR 16.17, 95% C1 8.77-29.82) Wfor trend < .001). Conclusions: The risk for stillbirth is substantially elevated among very high and extremely high parity women, and care providers may consider these groups for targeted pericanceptional counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 453
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States? [J].
Alexander, GR ;
Kogan, M ;
Martin, J ;
Papiernik, E .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 41 (01) :115-125
[2]  
Alexander GR, 1996, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V111, P408
[3]  
ALEXANDER GR, 1987, AM J PREV MED, V3, P243
[4]  
[Anonymous], UND IMPR HLTH OBJ IM
[5]  
AZIZ FA, 1980, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V18, P114
[6]   Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: Effects of parity on obstetric risk factors [J].
Babinszki, A ;
Kerenyi, T ;
Torok, O ;
Grazi, V ;
Lapinski, RH ;
Berkowitz, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (03) :669-674
[7]   Parity and pregnancy outcomes [J].
Bai, J ;
Wong, FWS ;
Bauman, A ;
Mohsin, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (02) :274-278
[8]   GRAND MULTIPARITY AS AN OBSTETRIC RISK FACTOR - A PROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL STUDY [J].
BRUNNER, J ;
MELANDER, E ;
KROOKBRANDT, M ;
THOMASSEN, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1992, 47 (03) :201-205
[9]   OBSTETRIC PERFORMANCE OF GRAND MULTIPARA [J].
CHANGE, A ;
LARKIN, P ;
ESLER, EJ ;
CONDIE, R ;
MORRISON, J .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1977, 1 (10) :330-332
[10]  
Clayton D., 1993, STAT MODELS EPIDEMIO