Personnel selection

被引:208
作者
Sackett, Paul R. [1 ]
Lievens, Filip [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management & Work, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Org Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
job performance; testing; validity; adverse impact; ability; personality;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We review developments in personnel selection since the previous review by Hough & Oswald (2000) in the Annual Review of Psycholog. We organize the review around a taxonomic structure of possible bases for improved selection, which includes (a) better understanding of the criterion domain and criterion measurement, (b) improved measurement of existing predictor methods or constructs, (c) identification and measurement of new predictor methods or constructs, (d) improved identification of features that moderate or mediate predictor-criterion relationships, (e) clearer understanding of the relationship between predictors or between predictors and criteria (e.g., via meta-analytic synthesis), (f) identification and prediction of new outcome variables, (g) improved ability to determine how well we predict the outcomes of interest, (b) improved understanding of subgroup differences, fairness, bias, and the legal defensibility, (i) improved administrative ease with which selection systems can be used, (j) improved insight into applicant reactions, and (k) improved decision-maker acceptance of selection systems.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 450
页数:32
相关论文
共 182 条
[1]  
Aguinis H., 2004, TEST SCORE BANDING H
[2]   Understanding the impact of test validity and bias on selection errors and adverse impact in human resource selection [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Smith, Marlene A. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) :165-199
[3]  
Anderson N., 2001, HDB IND WORK ORG PSY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CRITIQUE EMOTIONAL I
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, JUDGMENT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DISCRIMINATION WORK
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Validity generalization: A critical review
[9]   Convergrent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the assessment confer construct-related validity paradox [J].
Arthur, W ;
Woehr, DJ ;
Maldegen, R .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (04) :813-835
[10]   A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions [J].
Arthur, W ;
Day, EA ;
McNelly, TL ;
Edens, PS .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (01) :125-154