A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions

被引：199

作者：

Arthur, W ^{[1
]}

Day, EA

McNelly, TL

Edens, PS

机构：

[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA

[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA

来源：

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY | 2003年 / 56卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00146.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

We used meta-analytic procedures to investigate the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimension ratings. By focusing on dimension-level information, we were able to assess the extent to which specific constructs account for the criterion-related validity of assessment centers. From a total of 34 articles that reported dimension-level validities, we collapsed 168 assessment center dimension labels into an overriding set of 6 dimensions: (a) consideration/awareness of others, (b) communication, (c) drive, (d) influencing others, (e) organizing and planning, and (f) problem solving. Based on this set of 6 dimensions, we extracted 258 independent data points. Results showed a range of estimated true criterion-related validities from .25 to .39. A regression-based composite consisting of 4 out of the 6 dimensions accounted for the criterion-related validity of assessment center ratings and explained more variance in performance (20%) than Gaugler, Rosenthal, Thornton, and Bentson (1987) were able to explain using the overall assessment center rating (14%).

引用

页码：125 / 154

页数：30

共 67 条

[1] SELF-MONITORING AND SEX AS RELATED TO ASSESSMENT-CENTER RATINGS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].

ANDERSON, LR ;

THACKER, J .

BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 6 (04) :345-361

[2] The five-factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement [J].

Arthur, W ;

Graziano, WG .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1996, 64 (03) :593-618

[3] Convergrent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the assessment confer construct-related validity paradox [J].

Arthur, W ;

Woehr, DJ ;

Maldegen, R .

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (04) :813-835

[4] Multiple-choice and constructed response tests of ability: Race-based subgroup performance differences on alternative paper-and-pencil test formats [J].

Arthur, W ;

Edwards, BD ;

Barrett, GV .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (04) :985-1008

[5] Development of a job analysis-based procedure for weighting and combining content-related tests into a single test battery score [J].

Arthur, W ;

Doverspike, D ;

Barrett, GV .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (04) :971-985

[6] THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].

BARRICK, MR ;

MOUNT, MK .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26

[7] On the bias of Huffcutt and Arthur's (1995) procedure for identifying outliers in the meta-analysis of correlations [J].

Beal, DJ ;

Corey, DM ;

Dunlap, WP .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (03) :583-589

[8] VALIDITY OF PERSONNEL DECISIONS - A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFERENTIAL AND EVIDENTIAL BASES [J].

BINNING, JF ;

BARRETT, GV .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (03) :478-494

[9] SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY IN ASSESSMENT-CENTER RATINGS - A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].

BYCIO, P ;

ALVARES, KM ;

HAHN, J .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (03) :463-474

[10]

BYHAM WC, 1970, HARVARD BUS REV, V48, P150

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →