A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions

被引：199

作者：

Arthur, W ^{[1
]}

Day, EA

McNelly, TL

Edens, PS

机构：

[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA

[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA

来源：

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY | 2003年 / 56卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00146.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

We used meta-analytic procedures to investigate the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimension ratings. By focusing on dimension-level information, we were able to assess the extent to which specific constructs account for the criterion-related validity of assessment centers. From a total of 34 articles that reported dimension-level validities, we collapsed 168 assessment center dimension labels into an overriding set of 6 dimensions: (a) consideration/awareness of others, (b) communication, (c) drive, (d) influencing others, (e) organizing and planning, and (f) problem solving. Based on this set of 6 dimensions, we extracted 258 independent data points. Results showed a range of estimated true criterion-related validities from .25 to .39. A regression-based composite consisting of 4 out of the 6 dimensions accounted for the criterion-related validity of assessment center ratings and explained more variance in performance (20%) than Gaugler, Rosenthal, Thornton, and Bentson (1987) were able to explain using the overall assessment center rating (14%).

引用

页码：125 / 154

页数：30

共 67 条

[21] Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews [J].

Huffcutt, AI ;

Conway, JM ;

Roth, PL ;

Stone, NJ .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (05) :897-913

[22] DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW OUTLIER STATISTIC FOR METAANALYTIC DATA [J].

HUFFCUTT, AI ;

ARTHUR, W .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 80 (02) :327-334

[23] VALIDITY AND UTILITY OF ALTERNATIVE PREDICTORS OF JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].

HUNTER, JE ;

HUNTER, RF .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 96 (01) :72-98

[24] Personality and job performance: The big five revisited [J].

Hurtz, GM ;

Donovan, JJ .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (06) :869-879

[25] ATTEMPTING TO IMPROVE THE VALIDITY OF A WELL-ESTABLISHED ASSESSMENT-CENTER [J].

JONES, A ;

HERRIOT, P ;

LONG, B ;

DRAKELEY, R .

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 64 (01) :1-21

[26] EVALUATING DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT-CENTERS AS INTERVENTIONS [J].

JONES, RG ;

WHITMORE, MD .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 48 (02) :377-388

[27]

JONES RG, 1992, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG, V2, P195

[28] WHY DO ASSESSMENT-CENTERS WORK - THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT-CENTER VALIDITY [J].

KLIMOSKI, R ;

BRICKNER, M .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (02) :243-260

[29]

Kudisch JD, 1997, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V12, P129

[30] Trying to understand the different pieces of the construct validity puzzle of assessment centers: An examination of assessor and assessee effects [J].

Lievens, F .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (04) :675-686

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →