Neural correlates of changing intention in the human FEF and IPS

被引:9
作者
Astle, Duncan E. [1 ,2 ]
Nixon, Elena
Jackson, Stephen R. [3 ,4 ]
Jackson, Georgina M.
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Univ London, Dept Psychol, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Korea Univ, World Class Univ WCU, Dept Brain & Cognit Engn, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
cognitive control; event-related potentials; executive control; task switching; FRONTAL EYE-FIELD; TASK-SET CONTROL; FMRI; ATTENTION; MECHANISMS; COMPONENTS; MEMORY; MODULATION; ACTIVATION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00604.2011
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Astle DE, Nixon E, Jackson SR, Jackson GM. Neural correlates of changing intention in the human FEF and IPS. J Neurophysiol 107: 859-867, 2012. First published November 23, 2011; doi:10.1152/jn.00604.2011.-Previous research demonstrates that our apparent mental flexibility depends largely on the strength of our prior intention; changing our intention in advance enables a smooth transition from one task to another (e. g., Astle DE, Jackson GM, Swainson R. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 255-267, 2008; Duncan J, Emslie H, Williams P, Johnson R, Freer C. Cogn Psychol 30: 257-303, 1996; Husain M, Parton A, Hodgson TL, Mort D, Rees G. Nat Neurosci 6: 117-118, 2003). However, these necessarily rapid anticipatory mechanisms have been difficult to study in the human brain. We used EEG and magnetoencephalography, specifically event-related potentials and fields (ERPs and ERFs), respectively, to explore the neural correlates of this important aspect of mental flexibility. Subjects performed a manual version of a pro/antisaccade task using preparatory cues to switch between the pro- and antirules. When subjects switched their intention, we observed a positivity over central electrodes, which correlated significantly with our behavioral data; the greater the ERP effect, the stronger the subject's change of intention. ERFs, alongside subject-specific structural MRIs, were used to project into source space. When subjects switched their intention, they showed significantly elevated activity in the right frontal eye field and left intraparietal sulcus (IPS); the greater the left IPS activity on switch trials, the stronger the subject's change of intention. This network has previously been implicated in the top-down control of eye movements, but here we demonstrate its role in the top-down control of a task set, in particular, that it is recruited when we change the task that we intend to perform.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 867
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[2]   Multiple components of lateral posterior parietal activation associated with cognitive set shifting [J].
Asari, T ;
Konishi, S ;
Jimura, K ;
Miyashita, Y .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :694-702
[3]   The role of spatial information in advance task-set control: an event-related potential study [J].
Astle, D. E. ;
Jackson, G. M. ;
Swainson, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (07) :1404-1418
[4]   Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: A dense-sensor event-related potential study [J].
Astle, Duncan E. ;
Jackson, G. M. ;
Swainson, R. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (02) :255-267
[5]   Applying an Attentional Set to Perceived and Remembered Features [J].
Astle, Duncan Edward ;
Nobre, Anna Christina ;
Scerif, Gaia .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (10)
[6]   Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Brass, M ;
von Cramon, DY .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 16 (04) :609-620
[7]   fMRI activation in the human frontal eye field is correlated with saccadic reaction time [J].
Connolly, JD ;
Goodale, MA ;
Goltz, HC ;
Munoz, DP .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (01) :605-611
[8]   Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set [J].
Connolly, JD ;
Goodale, MA ;
Menon, RS ;
Munoz, DP .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 5 (12) :1345-1352
[9]   A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Akbudak, E ;
Conturo, TE ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Ollinger, JM ;
Drury, HA ;
Linenweber, MR ;
Petersen, SE ;
Raichle, ME ;
Van Essen, DC ;
Shulman, GL .
NEURON, 1998, 21 (04) :761-773
[10]  
De Jong R, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P357