The role of spatial information in advance task-set control: an event-related potential study

被引:20
作者
Astle, D. E. [1 ]
Jackson, G. M. [2 ]
Swainson, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Psychol, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
cognitive control; ERP; task-switching;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06439.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Task-switching has proved to be a fruitful paradigm for studying cognitive control mechanisms. Interestingly, this avenue of study has revealed that subjects are, to some degree, able to bring about a change in task-set prior to the performance of that task (provided that they are given advance warning of the upcoming task, for instance in the form of a cue). Event-related potentials (ERPs) have proved to be a good way of measuring these rapid anticipatory control processes. To explore these processes further, the current study examined the relationship between the availability of spatial information and cue-locked task-switching ERP effects. Two groups of subjects were compared: one group could separate the task-sets on the basis of the targets' colour (the 'colour' group), the second on the basis of the targets' location (the 'spatial' group). The performance of both groups benefited to the same extent from advance cueing of task-transitions (switches or repeats), yet the ERP data revealed cue-locked (but not target-locked) differences between the two groups. The most striking of these differences was the absence of both a late positivity over posterior scalp and a late negativity over frontal scalp when the spatial group switched between tasks. Thus, it seems unlikely that these effects index stimulus-response 'reconfiguration' per se-as the mappings were identical for both groups of subjects-but rather that these task-switching processes are sensitive to how the mappings are represented.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / 1418
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[2]   The influence of cue type on backward inhibition [J].
Arbuthnott, KD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (05) :1030-1042
[3]   The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost [J].
Arbuthnott, KD ;
Woodward, TS .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2002, 56 (01) :18-29
[4]   Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: An ERP study of task switching [J].
Astle, D. E. ;
Jackson, G. M. ;
Swainson, R. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1125 :94-103
[5]   Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: A dense-sensor event-related potential study [J].
Astle, Duncan E. ;
Jackson, G. M. ;
Swainson, R. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (02) :255-267
[6]   The Madrid card sorting test (MCST):: a task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event-related potentials [J].
Barceló, F .
BRAIN RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2003, 11 (01) :27-37
[7]   The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation [J].
Emerson, MJ ;
Miyake, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 48 (01) :148-168
[8]   Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality [J].
Ferree, TC ;
Luu, P ;
Russell, GS ;
Tucker, DM .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :536-544
[9]   Internally generated and directly cued task sets: an investigation with fMRI [J].
Forstmann, BU ;
Brass, M ;
Koch, I ;
von Cramon, DY .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 43 (06) :943-952
[10]  
Goschke T, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P331