A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies

被引:621
作者
van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C. [1 ]
Nijland, Nicol [1 ]
van Limburg, Maarten [1 ]
Ossebaard, Hans C. [2 ]
Kelders, Saskia M. [1 ]
Eysenbach, Gunther [3 ]
Seydel, Erwin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Sci, Dept Psychol Hlth & Technol, Ctr eHlth Res & Dis Management, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Ctr Global eHlth Innovat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
eHealth; design; participation; implementation; evaluation; multidisciplinary approach; Health; 2.0; Wiki; e-collaboration; HEALTH INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; WEB-BASED INTERVENTION; USER ACCEPTANCE; CARE; SUCCESS; DESIGN; TELEMEDICINE; SERVICES; IMPLEMENTATION; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.1672
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many eHealth technologies are not successful in realizing sustainable innovations in health care practices. One of the reasons for this is that the current development of eHealth technology often disregards the interdependencies between technology, human characteristics, and the socioeconomic environment, resulting in technology that has a low impact in health care practices. To overcome the hurdles with eHealth design and implementation, a new, holistic approach to the development of eHealth technologies is needed, one that takes into account the complexity of health care and the rituals and habits of patients and other stakeholders. Objective: The aim of this viewpoint paper is to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies by advocating a holistic approach toward their development and eventual integration in the health sector. Methods: To identify the potential and limitations of current eHealth frameworks (1999-2009), we carried out a literature search in the following electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Knowledge, PiCarta, and Google Scholar. Of the 60 papers that were identified, 44 were selected for full review. We excluded those papers that did not describe hands-on guidelines or quality criteria for the design, implementation, and evaluation of eHealth technologies (28 papers). From the results retrieved, we identified 16 eHealth frameworks that matched the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were used to posit strategies and principles for a holistic approach toward the development of eHealth technologies; these principles underpin our holistic eHealth framework. Results: A total of 16 frameworks qualified for a final analysis, based on their theoretical backgrounds and visions on eHealth, and the strategies and conditions for the research and development of eHealth technologies. Despite their potential, the relationship between the visions on eHealth, proposed strategies, and research methods is obscure, perhaps due to a rather conceptual approach that focuses on the rationale behind the frameworks rather than on practical guidelines. In addition, the Web 2.0 technologies that call for a more stakeholder-driven approach are beyond the scope of current frameworks. To overcome these limitations, we composed a holistic framework based on a participatory development approach, persuasive design techniques, and business modeling. Conclusions: To demonstrate the impact of eHealth technologies more effectively, a fresh way of thinking is required about how technology can be used to innovate health care. It also requires new concepts and instruments to develop and implement technologies in practice. The proposed framework serves as an evidence-based roadmap.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [41] Fogg B.J., 2009, PERS 2009 P 4 INT C, V40, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1541948.1541999, 10.1145/1541948.1541999]
  • [42] Freeman R.E., 2004, ZFWU, V5, P228, DOI DOI 10.5771/1439-880X-2004-3-228
  • [43] Periodic Prompts and Reminders in Health Promotion and Health Behavior Interventions: Systematic Review
    Fry, Jillian P.
    Neff, Roni A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (02)
  • [44] Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Desmartis, Marie
    Labrecque, Michel
    Car, Josip
    Pagliari, Claudia
    Pluye, Pierre
    Fremont, Pierre
    Gagnon, Johanne
    Tremblay, Nadine
    Legare, France
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (01) : 241 - 277
  • [45] Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Legare, France
    Labrecque, Michel
    Fremont, Pierre
    Pluye, Pierre
    Gagnon, Johanne
    Car, Josip
    Pagliari, Claudia
    Desmartis, Marie
    Turcot, Lucile
    Gravel, Karine
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [46] Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: lessons from health technology assessment
    Gagnon, MP
    Scott, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2005, 11 : 34 - 36
  • [47] Ganesh J., 2004, Indian Journal of Medical Informatics, V1, P39
  • [48] eHealth evaluation and dissemination research
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (05) : S119 - S126
  • [49] The evaluation of Telemedicine and health services research
    Grigsby, J
    Brega, AG
    Devore, PA
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2005, 11 (03): : 317 - 328
  • [50] Evaluation of ehealth systems and services - We need to move beyond hits and testimonials
    Gustafson, DH
    Wyatt, JC
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7449): : 1150 - 1150