Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach

被引:186
作者
Talluri, S
Narasimhan, R
Nair, A
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Marketing & Supply Chain Management, Eli Braod Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Business Complex, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Auburn Univ, Coll Business, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
chance-constrained programming; non-linear programming; purchasing; stochastic data envelopment analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The strategic importance of vendor evaluation is well established in the purchasing literature. Several evaluation methodologies that consider multiple performance attributes have been proposed for vendor evaluation purposes. While these techniques range from scoring models that utilize prior articulation of weights to derive composite scores for vendors to advanced mathematical models, methods that incorporate the inherent variability in vendor's performance attributes have been limited. The primary reason for the lack of development of such models is due to the complexities associated with stochastic approaches. In order to more accurately evaluate the performance of vendors, it is critical to consider variability in vendor attributes. This paper is an attempt to fill this void in vendor evaluation models by presenting a chance-constrained data envelopment analysis (CCDEA) approach in the presence of multiple performance measures that are uncertain. Our paper effectively demonstrates the first application of CCDEA in the area of purchasing, in general, and vendor evaluation, in particular. The model is demonstrated by applying it to a previously reported dataset from a pharmaceutical company. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 222
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   An analysis of the supplier selection process [J].
Verma, R ;
Pullman, ME .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 26 (06) :739-750
[42]  
Weber C. A., 1993, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, V23, P3, DOI 10.1108/09600039310038161
[43]   A MULTIOBJECTIVE APPROACH TO VENDOR SELECTION [J].
WEBER, CA ;
CURRENT, JR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 68 (02) :173-184
[44]   Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection [J].
Weber, CA ;
Current, JR ;
Desai, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 108 (01) :208-223
[45]   Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers [J].
Weber, CA ;
Desai, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 90 (01) :142-155
[46]  
Wei SY, 1997, 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT PROCESSING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 & 2, P468, DOI 10.1109/ICIPS.1997.672825
[47]   HISTORY OF THE EARTHS OBLIQUITY [J].
WILLIAMS, GE .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1993, 34 (01) :1-45
[48]  
Wind Y., 1968, J PURCHASING, V8, P29, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-493X.1968.tb00592.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-493X.1968.TB00592.X]
[49]  
Yates J. F., 1992, RISK TAKING BEHAV
[50]  
ZSIDISIN GA, 1999, BEST PRACTICES PURCH, P9