Replication Termination at Eukaryotic Chromosomes Is Mediated by Top2 and Occurs at Genomic Loci Containing Pausing Elements

被引:126
作者
Fachinetti, Daniele [1 ,2 ]
Bermejo, Rodrigo [1 ,2 ]
Cocito, Andrea [1 ]
Minardi, Simone [3 ]
Katou, Yuki [4 ]
Kanoh, Yutaka [4 ]
Shirahige, Katsuhiko [4 ]
Azvolinsky, Anna [5 ]
Zakian, Virginia A. [5 ]
Foiani, Marco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ist FIRC Oncol Mol IFOM IEO Campus, Fdn IFOM, I-20139 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, DSBB, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] COGENTECH Consortium Genom Technol, I-20139 Milan, Italy
[4] Tokyo Inst Technol, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2268501, Japan
[5] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
DNA TOPOISOMERASE-II; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; FORK PROGRESSION; BUDDING YEAST; DAMAGE RESPONSE; FRAGILE SITE; 3' END; TRANSCRIPTION; HELICASE; ORIGINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.024
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Chromosome replication initiates at multiple replicons and terminates when forks converge. In E. coli, the Tus-TER complex mediates polar fork converging at the terminator region, and aberrant termination events challenge chromosome integrity and segregation. Since in eukaryotes, termination is less characterized, we used budding yeast to identify the factors assisting fork fusion at replicating chromosomes. Using genomic and mechanistic studies, we have identified and characterized 71 chromosomal termination regions (TERs). TERs contain fork pausing elements that influence fork progression and merging. The Rrm3 DNA helicase assists fork progression across TERs, counteracting the accumulation of X-shaped structures. The Top2 DNA topoisomerase associates at TERs in S phase,. and G2/M facilitates fork fusion and prevents DNA breaks and genome rearrangements at TERs. We propose that in eukaryotes, replication fork barriers, Rrm3, and Top2 coordinate replication fork progression and fusion at TERs, thus counteracting abnormal genomic transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 605
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis [J].
Chan, Kok Lung ;
Palmai-Pallag, Timea ;
Ying, Songmin ;
Hickson, Ian D. .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2009, 11 (06) :753-U120
[12]   MITOTIC RECOMBINATION IN THE RDNA OF S-CEREVISIAE IS SUPPRESSED BY THE COMBINED ACTION OF DNA TOPOISOMERASES-I AND TOPOISOMERASES-II [J].
CHRISTMAN, MF ;
DIETRICH, FS ;
FINK, GR .
CELL, 1988, 55 (03) :413-425
[13]   A topoisomerase II-dependent mechanism for resetting replicons at the S-M-phase transition [J].
Cuvier, Olivier ;
Stanojcic, Slavica ;
Lemaitre, Jean-Marc ;
Mechali, Marcel .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 22 (07) :860-865
[14]   swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S-pombe [J].
Dalgaard, JZ ;
Klar, AJS .
CELL, 2000, 102 (06) :745-751
[15]   Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIα [J].
Dawlaty, Meelad M. ;
Malureanu, Liviu ;
Jeganathan, Karthik B. ;
Kao, Esther ;
Sustmann, Claudio ;
Tahk, Samuel ;
Shuai, Ke ;
Grosschedl, Rudolf ;
van Deursen, Jan M. .
CELL, 2008, 133 (01) :103-115
[16]   DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription [J].
Deshpande, AM ;
Newlon, CS .
SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5264) :1030-1033
[17]   DNA TOPOISOMERASE-II MUTANT OF SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE - TOPOISOMERASE-II IS REQUIRED FOR SEGREGATION OF DAUGHTER MOLECULES AT THE TERMINATION OF DNA-REPLICATION [J].
DINARDO, S ;
VOELKEL, K ;
STERNGLANZ, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1984, 81 (09) :2616-2620
[18]   Replicon Dynamics, Dormant Origin Firing, and Terminal Fork Integrity after Double-Strand Break Formation [J].
Doksani, Ylli ;
Bermejo, Rodrigo ;
Fiorani, Simona ;
Haber, James E. ;
Foiani, Marco .
CELL, 2009, 137 (02) :247-258
[19]   The replication fork trap and termination of chromosome replication [J].
Duggin, Iain G. ;
Wake, R. Gerry ;
Bell, Stephen D. ;
Hill, Thomas M. .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 70 (06) :1323-1333
[20]   EUKARYOTIC CHROMOSOME REPLICATION [J].
EDENBERG, HJ ;
HUBERMAN, JA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1975, 9 :245-284