25 years of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Erlangen: Assessment of the experience in 3498 patients

被引:60
作者
Rabenstein, T
Schneider, HT
Hahn, EG
Ell, C
机构
[1] Klinikum Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden, Dept Med 2, D-65119 Wiesbaden, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med 1, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1001439
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Study Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate the evolution of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) over a period of 25 years at its birthplace in Erlangen, Germany. Patients and Methods: A total of 3498 consecutive ESTs between 1973 and the end of 1997 were reviewed with respect to indications, technology, success, complications, therapy of complications and mortality: In order to demonstrate changes in the course of time, the results have been compiled separately for four time periods (A-D). Results: During the 25 years' practice of EST in Erlangen the frequency of ETSs has increased constantly and significant changes have been observed concerning the spectrum of indications: Bile duct stones (total 55.1 %) decreased continuously from 91.1 % (period A) to 35.7 % (period D). In contrast, the proportion of ESTs applied for malignant obstruction (total 22.1%) rose successively from 1.1 % (period A) to more than 25 % (periods B-D). Chronic pancreatitis as an indication for EST was established in period B (1.0%) and accounted for 20.2 % of all procedures in period D (total 8.0%). Several new indications (summarized as "others") increased from 1.8 % in period A to 11.9 % in period D (total 6.7 %) whereas biliary pancreatitis and scarred papillary stenosis remained constantly below 5 %. Whereas the "Erlangen sphincterotome" was the only sphincterotome used in period A, it was almost completely replaced by guide-wire sphincterotomes in period D. With the introduction of the needle knife the precut technique became popular and was used with increasing frequencies: period B 31.9 %, period C 34.1 %, period D 41.9 %. The success rate in total was 95.2 %, For each time period the highest success rate of EST was obtained for bile duct stones (96-98 %), whereas EST appeared to be more difficult in case of malignant obstruction (93.3 %) or chronic pancreatitis (90.2 %), but for both indications growing experience resulted in an increase in the success rates (85.7 % to 94.9 % and 90.9 % to 94.0 %, respectively). Complications occurred in 7.9 % of cases. The complication rate declined significantly from 10.5 % in period A over 7.6 % in period B to 6.3 % in period C. Prospective data acquisition in period D revealed a significant increase in the detection of mild forms of acute pancreatitis, resulting in a slight increase of the complication rate (8.4 %). Needle-knife papillotomy did not significantly increase the complication rate. Whereas in period A 41 % of all complications ere managed by surgery, this value dropped over 28 % (period B) and 7.5 % (period C) to ultimately 1.6% in period D. The method-related mortality was nearly constant over the whole period of time (0.6 %). Conclusions: Despite a continuous shift of indications and a changing mixture of learning endoscopists and EST experts over 25 years, the practice of EST at its birthplace in Erlangen has shown a constantly high success rate, a decreasing complication rate and an acceptable but mainly unchanged mortality rate. Currently nearly all complications can be successfully managed nonoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:A194 / A201
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
Ell C, 1989, Fortschr Med, V107, P351
[12]  
Ell C, 1988, Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med, V94, P112
[13]   Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: indications, outcome, and a safe stentless technique [J].
Elton, E ;
Howell, DA ;
Parsons, WG ;
Qaseem, T ;
Hanson, BL .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (03) :240-249
[14]   COMPLICATIONS OF MAJOR PAPILLA ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC SPHINCTEROTOMY - A REVIEW OF 106 PATIENTS [J].
ESBER, E ;
SHERMAN, S ;
EARLE, D ;
PEZZI, J ;
GOTTLIEB, K ;
LEHMAN, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (04) :422-422
[15]   Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[16]   Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention [J].
Huibregtse, K .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :961-963
[17]   PRECUT PAPILLOTOMY VIA FINE-NEEDLE KNIFE PAPILLOTOME - A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE [J].
HUIBREGTSE, K ;
KATON, RM ;
TYTGAT, GNJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1986, 32 (06) :403-405
[18]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY OF AMPULLA OF VATER [J].
KAWAI, K ;
AKASAKA, Y ;
MURAKAMI, K ;
TADA, M ;
KOHLI, Y ;
NAKAJIMA, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1974, 20 (04) :148-151
[19]   ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC DUCT SPHINCTEROTOMY - INDICATIONS, TECHNIQUE, AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS [J].
KOZAREK, RA ;
BALL, TJ ;
PATTERSON, DJ ;
BRANDABUR, JJ ;
TRAVERSE, LW ;
RALTZ, S .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (05) :592-598
[20]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY - THE WHOLE TRUTH [J].
LAMBERT, ME ;
BETTS, CD ;
HILL, J ;
FARAGHER, EB ;
MARTIN, DF ;
TWEEDLE, DEF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (04) :473-476