The effect of neuromuscular block and noxious stimulation on hypnosis monitoring during sevoflurane anesthesia

被引:41
作者
Ekman, Andreas
Stalberg, Erik
Sundman, Eva
Eriksson, Lars I.
Brudin, Lars
Sandin, Rolf
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, Sect Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Care, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000278117.31134.34
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results on the influence of neuromuscular block (NMB) on the bispectral index (BIS). We investigated the influence of two degrees of NMB on BIS, Alaris auditory-evoked potential index (AAI), and the electromyogram (EMG) obtained with needle electrodes from the frontal and temporal muscles, immediately adjacent to the BIS-sensor. METHODS: Twenty patients were anesthetized with sevoflurane, titrated for 30 min to an end-tidal concentration of 1.2% (baseline). Rocuronium was infused to 50% (partial) and 95% (profound) depression of the first twitch in a train-of-four response, the order being randomly chosen. Noxious tetanic electrical stimulation was applied at four occasions: 1) at baseline (control measurement), 2 and 3) at each degree of NMB, and 4) after neostigmine reversal. BIS, AAI, and EMG were obtained 2 min before and 2 min after each noxious stimulation. RESULTS: Median BIS and AAI at baseline were 44 (39-50) and 15 (14-16), respectively. The two degrees of NMB did not affect BIS, AAI, and EMG before noxious stimulation. In contrast, profound NMB altered the BIS and AAI responses to noxious stimulation when compared with partial NMB, (BIS P = 0.01, AAI P < 0.01), after neostigmine reversal (BIS P < 0.01, AAI P 0.01) and compared with baseline (BIS P = 0.08, AAI P = 0.02). No significant increase in EMG was found. CONCLUSION: BIS and AAI responses to noxious tetanic electrical stimulation are affected by the degree of NMB during sevoflurane anesthesia whereas NMB does not affect BIS or AAI in the absence of noxious stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 695
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory evoked potential system on levels of consciousness, and on the bispectral index [J].
Absalom, AR ;
Sutcliffe, N ;
Kenny, GNC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (05) :778-780
[2]
A SIMPLE STUDY OF AWARENESS AND DREAMING DURING ANAESTHESIA [J].
BRICE, DD ;
HETHERINGTON, RR ;
UTTING, JE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1970, 42 (06) :535-+
[3]
Electromyographic activity falsely elevates the bispectral index [J].
Bruhn, J ;
Bouillon, TW ;
Shafer, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (05) :1485-1487
[4]
Different conditions that could result in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect hypnotic state [J].
Dahaba, AA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (03) :765-773
[5]
A comparison of bispectral index and rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index responses to noxious stimulation during sevoflurane anesthesia [J].
Ekman, A ;
Brudin, L ;
Sandin, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (04) :1141-1146
[6]
Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring [J].
Ekman, A ;
Lindholm, ML ;
Lennmarken, C ;
Sandin, R .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 48 (01) :20-26
[7]
Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans - Simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography of awake human volunteers [J].
Eriksson, LI ;
Sundman, E ;
Olsson, R ;
Nilsson, L ;
Witt, H ;
Ekberg, O ;
Kuylenstiema, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (05) :1035-1043
[8]
ATRACURIUM, VECURONIUM, AND PANCURONIUM DO NOT ALTER THE MINIMUM ALVEOLAR CONCENTRATION OF HALOTHANE IN HUMANS [J].
FAHEY, MR ;
SESSLER, DI ;
CANNON, JE ;
BRADY, K ;
STOEN, R ;
MILLER, RD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 71 (01) :53-56
[9]
FORBES AR, 1979, ANESTH ANALG, V58, P497
[10]
Muscle relaxation does not alter hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia [J].
Greif, R ;
Greenwald, S ;
Schweitzer, E ;
Laciny, S ;
Rajek, A ;
Caldwell, JE ;
Sessler, DI .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (03) :604-608