Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients

被引:285
作者
Eriksen, MT [1 ]
Wibe, A
Norstein, J
Haffner, J
Wiig, JN
机构
[1] Buskerud Hosp, Dept Surg, N-3004 Drammen, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Surg, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Dept Surg, Oslo, Norway
关键词
anastomotic leakage; rectal cancer; mesorectal excision; national cohort study;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Mesorectal excision is successfully implemented as the standard surgical technique for rectal cancer resections in Norway. This technique has been associated with higher rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) and the purpose of this study was to examine AL in a large national cohort of patients. Methods This was a prospective national cohort study of 1958 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery with anterior resection in Norway from November 1993 to December 1999. Results The overall rate of AL was 11.6% (228 of 1958 patients). In a multivariate analysis, the risk of AL was significantly higher in males (odds ratio (OR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.2), in patients receiving pre-operative radiotherapy (OR 2.2, CI 1.0-4.7) and in low level (4-6 cm) (OR 3.5, CI 1.6-7.7) and ultra-low level (<= 3 cm) anastomoses (OR 5.4, CI 2.3-12.9). The presence of a diverting stoma was associated with a 60% reduction in the risk of AL (OR 0.4, CI 0.3-0.7) for anastomoses 6 cm and below. 30-day mortality was significantly higher for the patients with AL (7.0%, CI 3.7-10.3) compared with no AL (2.4%, CI 1.7-3.2) AL had no significant effect on local recurrence rate (log rank P = 0.608). Conclusion Low anastomoses should be defunctioned to avoid AL and the associated high perioperative mortality. No effect of AL on local recurrence was found in this large cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS IN COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - A RISK FACTOR FOR RECURRENCE [J].
AKYOL, AM ;
MCGREGOR, JR ;
GALLOWAY, DJ ;
MURRAY, GD ;
GEORGE, WD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1991, 6 (04) :179-183
[2]   Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: Multivariate analysis of 707 patients [J].
Alves, A ;
Panis, Y ;
Trancart, D ;
Regimbeau, JM ;
Pocard, M ;
Valleur, P .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (04) :499-502
[3]   Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? [J].
Balkwill, F ;
Mantovani, A .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) :539-545
[4]   Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence [J].
Bell, SW ;
Walker, KG ;
Rickard, MJFX ;
Sinclair, G ;
Dent, OF ;
Chapuis, PH ;
Bokey, EL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (10) :1261-1266
[5]   Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery [J].
Bruce, J ;
Krukowski, ZH ;
Al-Khairy, G ;
Russell, EM ;
Park, KGM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) :1157-1168
[6]  
Carlsen E, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P526
[7]  
Dehni N, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1114
[8]   Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection [J].
Hallbook, O ;
Pahlman, L ;
Krog, M ;
Wexner, SD ;
Sjodahl, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (01) :58-65
[9]   Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum [J].
Hallbook, O ;
Sjodahl, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (01) :60-62
[10]   THE LOW STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS [J].
HEALD, RJ ;
LEICESTER, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 68 (05) :333-337