Getting serious about maintaining biodiversity

被引:34
作者
Blignaut, James [1 ]
Aronson, James [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, ASSET Res, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] CNRS, Restorat Ecol Grp, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, UMR 5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2008年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Biodiversity; discount rates; economic valuation; ecosystem services; restoring natural capital(RNC);
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00006.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Biodiversity is neither a marketable good or product, nor a service; it is the living web that connects the tangible and intangible elements of healthy ecosystems, which is the essence of so-called renewable natural capital. The maintenance of biodiversity is therefore not just an ecosystem service among many-it is the sine qua non of ensuring a sustainable future. That is why the maintenance of biodiversity, partly through the augmentation, or restoration, of renewable natural capital, requires the full attention and action of policy-makers, practitioners, and scientists concerned with sustainability. This, in turn, requires a new approach to accounting and valuation of ecological restoration of damaged or degraded ecosystems. Here we seek to clarify the relation of biodiversity maintenance to ecosystem services, and to outline a new approach to the economic valuation of the restoration of renewable natural capital. A key element in this approach to economic valuation is the development and application of negative discount rates. Changing the way we think about the discount rate and, more broadly, the way we calculate costs and benefits related to restoration can contribute much to advance the maintenance of biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 17
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
Daly H. E., 2004, ECOLOGICAL EC PRINCI
[12]   Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting [J].
Dasgupta, P ;
Maskin, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (04) :1290-1299
[13]  
de Groot RS, 1992, FUNCTIONS NATURE
[14]  
Georgescu-Roegen N., 1971, ENTROPY LAW EC PROCE, DOI DOI 10.4159/HARVARD.9780674281653
[15]  
*GFN, 2006, NAT FOOTPR ACC 2006
[16]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RESTORING WETLANDS 2 SWEDISH CASE-STUDIES [J].
GREN, IM .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 4 (02) :153-162
[17]  
Hoel M., 2006, 0618 RES FUT
[18]   Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden [J].
Hougner, Cajsa ;
Colding, Johan ;
Soderqvist, Tore .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (03) :364-374
[19]   Gardenification of wildland nature and the human footprint [J].
Janzen, D .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5355) :1312-1313
[20]   Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration [J].
Milon, JW ;
Scrogin, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (02) :162-175