Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey

被引:86
作者
Bonsmann, S. Storcksdieck Genannt [1 ]
Celemin, L. Fernandez [1 ]
Larranaga, A. [1 ]
Egger, S. [1 ]
Wills, J. M. [1 ]
Hodgkins, C. [2 ]
Raats, M. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] European Food Informat Council, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Psychol, Food Consumer Behav & Hlth Res Ctr, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
关键词
labelling; nutrition information; food products; consumers; CLAIMS; PREVALENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1038/ejcn.2010.179
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 [营养与食品卫生学];
摘要
Objectives: The European Union (EU)-funded project Food Labelling to Advance Better Education for Life (FLABEL) aims to understand how nutrition information on food labels affects consumers' dietary choices and shopping behaviour. The first phase of this study consisted of assessing the penetration of nutrition labelling and related information on various food products in all 27 EU Member States and Turkey. Methods: In each country, food products were audited in three different types of retailers to cover as many different products as possible within five food and beverage categories: sweet biscuits, breakfast cereals, pre-packed chilled ready meals, carbonated soft drinks and yoghurts. Results: More than 37 000 products were audited in a total of 84 retail stores. On average, 85% of the products contained back-of- pack (BOP) nutrition labelling or related information (from 70% in Slovenia to 97% in Ireland), versus 48% for front-of-pack (FOP) information (from 24% in Turkey to 82% in the UK). The most widespread format was the BOP tabular or linear listing of nutrition content. Guideline daily amounts labelling was the most prevalent form of FOP information, showing an average penetration of 25% across all products audited. Among categories, breakfast cereals showed the highest penetration of nutrition-related information, with 94% BOP penetration and 70% FOP penetration. Conclusions: Nutrition labelling and related information was found on a large majority of products audited. These findings provide the basis for subsequent phases of FLABEL involving attention, reading, liking, understanding and use by consumers of different nutrition labelling formats. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2010) 64, 1379-1385; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.179; published online 1 September 2010
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1385
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2006, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN
[2]
Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims fop processed foods: 1997 Food Label and Package Survey [J].
Brecher, SJ ;
Bender, MM ;
Wilkening, VL ;
McCabe, NM ;
Anderson, EM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2000, 100 (09) :1057-1062
[3]
A holistic food labelling strategy for preventing obesity and dental caries [J].
Cinar, A. B. ;
Murtomaa, H. .
OBESITY REVIEWS, 2009, 10 (03) :357-361
[4]
Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review [J].
Cowburn, G ;
Stockley, L .
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2005, 8 (01) :21-28
[5]
*EC, 2008, OFF J IN PRESS
[6]
*EC, 1990, OFF J L, V276, P40
[7]
*EUR ADV SERV, 2004, INTR MAND NUTR LAB E, P76
[8]
Consumers' valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study [J].
Gracia, Azucena ;
Loureiro, Maria L. ;
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2009, 20 (07) :463-471
[9]
A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels [J].
Grunert K.G. ;
Wills J.M. .
Journal of Public Health, 2007, 15 (5) :385-399
[10]
Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries [J].
Grunert, Klaus G. ;
Fernandez-Celemin, Laura ;
Wills, Josephine M. ;
Nureeva, Liliya .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2010, 18 (03) :261-277