Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD

被引:2373
作者
Verdonk, ML
Cole, JC
Hartshorn, MJ
Murray, CW
Taylor, RD
机构
[1] Astex Technol Ltd, Cambridge CB4 OQA, England
[2] Cambridge Crystallograph Data Ctr, Cambridge, England
来源
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS | 2003年 / 52卷 / 04期
关键词
scoring functions; consensus docking; virtual screening; chemscore; binding mode; binding affinity;
D O I
10.1002/prot.10465
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Chemscore function was implemented as a scoring function for the protein-ligand docking program GOLD, and its performance compared to the original Goldscore function and two consensus docking protocols, "Goldscore-CS" and "Chemscore-GS," in terms of docking accuracy, prediction of binding affinities, and speed. In the "Goldscore-GS" protocol, dockings produced with the Goldscore function are scored and ranked with the Chemscore function; in the "Chemscore-GS" protocol, dockings produced with the Chemscore function are scored and ranked with the Goldscore function. Comparisons were made for a "clean" set of 224 protein-ligand complexes, and for two subsets of this set, one for which the ligands are "drug-like," the other for which they are "fragment-like." For "drug-like" and "fragment-like" ligands, the docking accuracies obtained with Chemscore and Goldscore functions are similar. For larger ligands, Goldscore gives superior results. Docking with the Chemscore function is up to three times faster than docking with the Goldscore function. Both combined docking protocols give significant improvements in docking accuracy over the use of the Goldscore or Chemscore function alone. "Goldscore-GS" gives success rates of up to 81% (top-ranked GOLD solution within 2.0 Angstrom of the experimental binding mode) for the "clean list," but at the cost of long search times. For most virtual screening applications, "Chemscore-GS" seems optimal; search settings that give docking speeds of around 0.25-1.3 min/compound have success rates of about 78% for "drug-like" compounds and 85% for "fragment-like" compounds. In terms of producing binding energy estimates, the Goldscore function appears to perform better than the Chemscore function and the two consensus protocols, particularly for faster search settings. Even at docking speeds of around 1-2 min/compound, the Goldscore function predicts binding energies with a standard deviation of similar to10.5 kJ/mol. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 623
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Baxter CA, 1998, PROTEINS, V33, P367, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<367::AID-PROT6>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-N
  • [3] New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databases
    Baxter, CA
    Murray, CW
    Waszkowycz, B
    Li, J
    Sykes, RA
    Bone, RGA
    Perkins, TDJ
    Wylie, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2000, 40 (02): : 254 - 262
  • [4] The Protein Data Bank
    Berman, HM
    Westbrook, J
    Feng, Z
    Gilliland, G
    Bhat, TN
    Weissig, H
    Shindyalov, IN
    Bourne, PE
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) : 235 - 242
  • [5] Sensitivity of molecular docking to induced fit effects in influenza virus neuraminidase
    Birch, L
    Murray, CW
    Hartshorn, MJ
    Tickle, IJ
    Verdonk, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2002, 16 (12) : 855 - 869
  • [6] High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design
    Blundell, TL
    Jhoti, H
    Abell, C
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2002, 1 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [7] Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening
    Boehm, HJ
    Boehringer, M
    Bur, D
    Gmuender, H
    Huber, W
    Klaus, W
    Kostrewa, D
    Kuehne, H
    Luebbers, T
    Meunier-Keller, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (14) : 2664 - 2674
  • [9] Structure-based screening of low-affinity compounds
    Carr, R
    Jhoti, H
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2002, 7 (09) : 522 - 527
  • [10] Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins
    Charifson, PS
    Corkery, JJ
    Murcko, MA
    Walters, WP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (25) : 5100 - 5109