Robotic assisted laparoscopic sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy: Initial experience

被引:28
作者
Kaouk, JH
Desai, MM
Abreu, SC
Papay, F
Gill, IS
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Sect Laparoscop & Minimally Invas Surg, Inst Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
prostate; laparoseopy; robotics; prostatectomy; sural nerve;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000073208.18059.62
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Sural nerve grafting has been done in select patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with unilateral or bilateral wide excision of the neurovascular bundle in an effort to preserve potency. We describe a novel technique of laparoscopic sural nerve grafting after radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California) robot. Materials and Methods: The procedure was performed successfully in 3 potent men 48, 49 and 59 years old, respectively. In patient 1 the entire procedure was performed robotically using a 6 port transperitoneal approach. In patients 2 and 3 the robot was used only for sural nerve grafting and urethrovesical. anastomosis, while radical prostatectomy was performed by conventional laparoseopy. After the completion of radical prostatectomy with deliberate wide resection of the 2 neurovascular bundles in patients 1 and 3, and unilateral excision of the left neurovascular bundle in patient 2 a plastic surgery team harvested 10 to 15 cm of sural nerve from the left calf. Sural nerve grafts were interposed robotically by placing 4 to 6 interrupted perineural stitches of 6 or 7-zero polypropylene sutures. Results: Mean operative time was 6.5 hours, mean blood loss was 216 cc and mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Surgical margins were focally positive at the apex in the patients 1 and 3. During a followup of 7, 5 and 1 months patient 1 reported penile engorgement with sildenafil not sufficient for penetration, patient 2 with unilateral nerve preservation was potent without any medication and patient 3 did not achieve any degree of erection, respectively. Conclusions: The da Vinci remote robotic system technically facilitates sural nerve grafting during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Long-term potency data are essential to validate the technical success.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 912
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot [J].
Abbou, CC ;
Hoznek, A ;
Salomon, L ;
Olsson, LE ;
Lobontiu, A ;
Saint, F ;
Cicco, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Chopin, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (06) :1964-1966
[2]   Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Binder, J ;
Kramer, W .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (04) :408-410
[3]  
Bollens Renaud, 2001, Journal of Urology, V165, P330
[4]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[5]   NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A DIFFERENT VIEW [J].
GEARY, ES ;
DENDINGER, TE ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :145-149
[6]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technique [J].
Gill, IS ;
Zippe, CD .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (02) :423-+
[7]   A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: A tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy [J].
Graefen, M ;
Haese, A ;
Pichlmeier, U ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Noldus, J ;
Butz, K ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Henke, RP ;
Michl, U ;
Fernandez, S ;
Huland, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) :857-863
[8]  
Guillonneau B, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X
[9]  
Guillonneau Bertrand, 2001, Journal of Urology, V165, P150
[10]   Bilateral nerve grafting during radical retropubic prostatectomy: Extended follow-up [J].
Kim, ED ;
Nath, R ;
Slawin, KM ;
Kadmon, D ;
Miles, BJ ;
Scardino, PT .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :983-987