Bioprocess optimization for cell culture based influenza vaccine production

被引:40
作者
Aggarwal, Kunal [1 ]
Jing, Frank [1 ]
Maranga, Luis [1 ]
Liu, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] MedImmune, Cell Culture Dev, Vaccine Dev, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
关键词
Influenza virus; Vaccine production; Multiplicity of infection; MOCK cells; LAIV; Process optimization; VIRUS PRODUCTION; INFECTION; PLATFORM; SERUM; VERO;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.081
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Uncertainties and shortcomings associated with the current influenza vaccine production processes demand attention and exploration of new vaccine manufacture technologies. Based on a newly developed mammalian cell culture-based production process we investigated selected process parameters and describe three factors that are shown to impact productivity, process robustness and development time. They are time of infection, harvest time and virus input, or multiplicity of infection (MOI). By defining the time of infection as 4-5 days post cell seeding and harvest time as 2-3 days post-infection and comparing their effect on virus production, MOI is subsequently identified as the most impactful process parameter for live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) manufacture. Infection at very low MOI (between 10(-4) and 10(-6) FFU/cell) resulted in high titer virus production (up to 30-fold productivity improvement) compared to higher MOI infections (10(-3) to 10(-2) FFU/cell). Application of these findings has allowed us to develop a platform process that can reduce the development time to approximately three weeks for an influenza vaccine manufacture process for new strains. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3320 / 3328
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2006, MMWR Recomm Rep, V55, P1
[2]   GENE COMPOSITION OF HIGH-YIELDING INFLUENZA VACCINE STRAINS OBTAINED BY RECOMBINATION [J].
BAEZ, M ;
PALESE, P ;
KILBOURNE, ED .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1980, 141 (03) :362-365
[3]  
Barrett PN, 2010, CURR OPIN MOL THER, V12, P21
[4]   Live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children [J].
Belshe, Robert B. ;
Edwards, Kathryn M. ;
Vesikari, Timo ;
Black, Steven V. ;
Walker, Robert E. ;
Hultquist, Micki ;
Kemble, George ;
Connor, Edward M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (07) :685-696
[5]   FluBlok, a next generation influenza vaccine manufactured in insect cells [J].
Cox, Manon M. J. ;
Hollister, Jason R. .
BIOLOGICALS, 2009, 37 (03) :182-189
[6]   Wave microcarrier cultivation of MDCK cells for influenza virus production in serum containing and serum-free media [J].
Genzel, Y. ;
Olmer, R. M. ;
Schafer, B. ;
Reichl, U. .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 (35-36) :6074-6087
[7]   Production of Cell Culture (MDCK) Derived Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) in a Fully Disposable Platform Process [J].
George, Meena ;
Farooq, Masiha ;
Dang, Thi ;
Cortes, Bernadette ;
Liu, Jonathan ;
Maranga, Luis .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2010, 106 (06) :906-917
[8]   The annual production cycle for influenza vaccine [J].
Gerdil, C .
VACCINE, 2003, 21 (16) :1776-1779
[9]   Development of cell culture (MDCK) live cold-adapted (CA) attenuated influenza vaccine [J].
Ghendon, YZ ;
Markushin, SG ;
Akopova, II ;
Koptiaeva, IB ;
Nechaeva, EA ;
Mazurkova, LA ;
Radaeva, IF ;
Kolokoltseva, TD .
VACCINE, 2005, 23 (38) :4678-4684
[10]   Novel generations of influenza vaccines [J].
Kemble, G ;
Greenberg, H .
VACCINE, 2003, 21 (16) :1789-1795