Interventional and intraoperative MRI at low field scanner -: a review

被引:48
作者
Blanco, RT [1 ]
Ojala, R [1 ]
Kariniemi, J [1 ]
Perälä, J [1 ]
Niinimäki, J [1 ]
Tervonen, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Oulu, Finland
关键词
interventional; MRI; MR-guidance; low field; biopsy; therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.03.033
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a cutting edge imaging modality in detecting diseases and pathologic tissue. The superior soft tissue contrast in MRI allows better definition of the pathology. MRI is increasingly used for guiding, monitoring and controlling percutaneous procedures and surgery. The rapid development of interventional techniques in radiology has led to integration of imaging with computers, new therapy devices and operating room like conditions. This has projected as faster and more accurate imaging and hence more demanding procedures have been applied to the repertoire of the interventional radiologist. In combining features of various other imaging modalities and adding some more into them, interventional MRI (IMRI) has potential to take further the interventional radiology techniques, minimally invasive therapies and surgery. The term "Interventional MRI" consists in short all those procedures, which are performed under MRI guidance. These procedures can be either percutaneous or open surgical of nature. One of the limiting factors in implementing MRI as guidance modality for interventional procedures has been the fact, that most widely used magnet design, a cylindrical magnet, is not ideal for guiding procedures as it does not allow direct access to the patient. Open, low field scanners usually operating around 0.2 T, offer this feature. Clumsy hardware, bad patient access, slow image update frequency and strong magnetic fields have been other limiting factors for interventional MRI. However, the advantages of MRI as an imaging modality have been so obvious that considerable development has taken place in the 20-year history of MRI. The image quality has become better, ever faster software, new innovative sequences, better MRI hardware and increased computing power have accelerated imaging speed and image quality to a totally new level. Perhaps the most important feature in the recent development has been the introduction of open configuration low field MRI devices in the early 1990s; this enabled direct patient access and utilization of the MRI as an interventional device. This article reviews the current status of interventional and intraoperative MRI with special emphasis in low field surrounding. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 142
页数:13
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]   Interventional MR imaging:: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen [J].
Adam, G ;
Bücker, A ;
Nolte-Ernsting, C ;
Tacke, J ;
Günther, RW .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (08) :1471-1478
[2]   Cost comparison analysis of low-field (0.23 T) MRI- and CT-guided bone biopsies [J].
Alanen, J ;
Keski-Nisula, L ;
Blanco-Sequeiros, R ;
Tervonen, O .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) :123-128
[3]   The present and future role of intraoperative MRI in neurosurgical procedures [J].
Alexander, E ;
Moriarty, TM ;
Kikinis, R ;
Black, P ;
Jolesz, FM .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 68 (1-4) :10-17
[4]   Visualization of dedicated catheters using fast scanning techniques with potential for MR-guided vascular interventions [J].
Bakker, CJ ;
Hoogeveen, RM ;
Weber, J ;
vanVaals, JJ ;
Viergever, MA ;
Mali, WP .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (06) :816-820
[5]   USE OF A FRAMELESS, ARMLESS STEREOTAXIC WAND FOR BRAIN-TUMOR LOCALIZATION WITH 2-DIMENSIONAL AND 3-DIMENSIONAL NEUROIMAGING [J].
BARNETT, GH ;
KORMOS, DW ;
STEINER, CP ;
WEISENBERGER, J .
NEUROSURGERY, 1993, 33 (04) :674-678
[6]  
BERGER MS, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1784, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1784::AID-CNCR2820740622>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-D
[8]   Brain tumor surgery with the Toronto open magnetic resonance imaging system: Preliminary results for 36 patients and analysis of advantages, disadvantages, and future prospects [J].
Bernstein, M ;
Al-Anazi, AR ;
Kucharczyk, W ;
Manninen, P ;
Bronskill, M ;
Henkelman, M .
NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 46 (04) :900-907
[9]   Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging unit [J].
Black, PM ;
Alexander, E ;
Martin, C ;
Moriarty, T .
NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 45 (03) :423-431
[10]   Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications [J].
Black, PM ;
Moriarty, T ;
Alexander, E ;
Stieg, P ;
Woodard, EJ ;
Gleason, PL ;
Martin, CH ;
Kikinis, R ;
Schwartz, RB ;
Jolesz, FA .
NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 41 (04) :831-842