Alternative models for carcinogenicity testing

被引:42
作者
Cohen, SM
Robinson, D
MacDonald, J
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Microbiol, Nebraska Med Ctr 983135, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Eppley Inst Res Canc, Nebraska Med Ctr 983135, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[3] Int Life Sci Inst, Hlth & Enviornm Sci Inst, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[4] Schering Plough Res Inst, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
关键词
carcinogenesis testing; hazard identification; risk assessment; rodent bioassay; transgenic models;
D O I
10.1093/toxsci/64.1.14
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group on Safety suggested that under certain circumstances, data from alternative assays could be used in safety evaluation in place of a second bioassay. Several alternatives were discussed. Six of these models were evaluated in a collaborative effort under the auspices of the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Standard protocols, pathology review, and statistical evaluations were developed. Twenty-one chemicals were evaluated, including genotoxic, nongenotoxic, carcinogenic, and noncarcinogenic chemicals. The models that were evaluated included the p53(+/-) heterozygous knockout mouse, the rasH2 transgenic mouse, the TgAC transgenic mouse (dermal and oral administration), the homozygous XPA knockout and the XPA/p53 knockout mouse models. Also evaluated were the neonatal mouse models and the Syrian Hamster Embryo (SHE) transformation assay. The results of this comprehensive study suggest that some of these models might be useful in hazard identification if used in conjunction with information from other sources in a weight of evidence, integrated analysis approach to risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 19
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]  
McGregor DB, 1999, IARC SCI PUBL, P1
[12]  
POPP JA, IN PRESS TOXICOL PAT
[13]   Workshop overview: Scientific and regulatory challenges for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals in toxicity testing [J].
Purchase, IFH ;
Botham, PA ;
Bruner, LH ;
Flint, OP ;
Frazier, JM ;
Stokes, WS .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 43 (02) :86-101
[14]   Laboratory animal tests and human cancer [J].
Rall, DP .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2000, 32 (02) :119-128
[15]   IDENTIFYING CHEMICAL CARCINOGENS AND ASSESSING POTENTIAL RISK IN SHORT-TERM BIOASSAYS USING TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS [J].
TENNANT, RW ;
FRENCH, JE ;
SPALDING, JW .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 103 (10) :942-950
[16]   The utility of two rodent species in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in Europe [J].
VanOosterhout, JPJ ;
VanDerLaan, JW ;
DeWaal, EJ ;
Olejniczak, K ;
Hilgenfeld, M ;
Schmidt, V ;
Bass, R .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 25 (01) :6-17
[17]  
1995, FED REG, V60, P11278