A Nonparametric Index for Determining the Numbers of Events in Clusters

被引:10
作者
Pei, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nearest-neighbor; Feature; Noise; Cluster; Poisson process; Complete spatial randomness; SPATIAL-PATTERNS; DISTANCE; RANDOMNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s11004-011-9325-x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The task of discriminating between heterogeneity and complete spatial randomness (CSR) for a given point process can be divided into three subtasks: the identification of the point pattern; the determination of the sizes of clusters; and the estimation of the numbers of events in dominant clusters. Many studies have been performed regarding the first and second subtasks. However, limited work has been done on the third aspect; hence, the determination of the number of events in each dominant cluster is still an unsolved problem. In this paper, we provide a solution by constructing a new index which is defined as the ratio between the variance of the (k+1)th nearest distance and that of the kth nearest distance. Our method can be divided into two phases: the detection of point pattern and the estimation of the numbers of events in dominant clusters. These phases can be estimated by the values at which the index abruptly decreases to be less than 1. A comparative study between the existing indices and our index shows the following: (i) our index can indicate the numbers of events in dominant clusters in a relatively objective way, which is different from the K-function revealing the sizes of clustered patterns; (ii) it is a nonparametric index and is easy to implement; and (iii) it demonstrates the highest detection power for differentiating between heterogeneity and CSR. The simulations and two seismic case studies also confirmed the correctness of our method.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 362
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GIS and Crime Mapping, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118685181
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Interactive spatial data analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST
[4]   TESTING SPATIAL RANDOMNESS BY MEANS OF ANGLES [J].
ASSUNCAO, R .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (02) :531-537
[5]  
BESAG J, 1977, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V39, P73
[6]  
Besag J.E., 1973, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, V45, P153
[7]   ON SAMPLING SPATIAL PATTERNS BY DISTANCE METHODS [J].
BYTH, K ;
RIPLEY, BD .
BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (02) :279-284
[8]   ON ROBUST DISTANCE-BASED INTENSITY ESTIMATORS [J].
BYTH, K .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :127-135
[9]   DISTANCE TO NEAREST NEIGHBOR AS A MEASURE OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN POPULATIONS [J].
CLARK, PJ ;
EVANS, FC .
ECOLOGY, 1954, 35 (04) :445-453
[10]   CONDITIONED DISTANCE RATIO METHOD FOR ANALYZING SPATIAL PATTERNS [J].
COX, TF ;
LEWIS, T .
BIOMETRIKA, 1976, 63 (03) :483-491