Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

被引:12
作者
Dunn, MD
McDougall, EM
Clayman, RV
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Div Urol, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Urol, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2000.14.849
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although open nephrectomy is the standard of care for localized renal-cell carcinoma, the significant postoperative pain and lengthy convalescence have encouraged the use of laparoscopy, which can yield similar 2- to 5-year survival rates, Either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal approach may be used, and sometimes, they are combined. Generally, the technique is limited to tumors <10 cm, but larger tumors can be removed, Nitrous oxide is avoided as an anesthetic agent. The dissection follows accepted oncologic principles: in situ renal dissection within Gerota's fascia, early ligation of the renal vessels, and careful removal of the specimen to prevent tumor spillage. Dissection of the hilum is facilitated by a PEER retractor and an Endoholder. On average, patients having laparoscopic radical nephrectomy return to normal activities approximately 4.5 weeks sooner than those having open surgery, a fact not taken into account in cost analyses, Laparoscopic nephrectomy may offer a special benefit in patients with known metastatic disease, as interleukin-2 administration can be started a month earlier than after open surgery, There may also be immunologic benefits of minimally invasive <nu> open surgery. The technique and instruments continue to evolve, and cost-effectiveness should continue to improve.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 855
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY IN 185 PATIENTS - A MULTIINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW [J].
GILL, IS ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
EHRLICH, R ;
EVANS, R ;
FUCHS, G ;
GERSHAM, A ;
HULBERT, JC ;
MCDOUGALL, EM ;
ROSENTHAL, T ;
SCHUESSLER, WW ;
SHEPARD, T .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (02) :479-483
[12]   Learning curve and conversion to open surgery in cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy and nephrectomy [J].
Higashihara, E ;
Baba, S ;
Nakagawa, K ;
Murai, M ;
Go, H ;
Takeda, M ;
Takahashi, K ;
Suzuki, K ;
Fujita, K ;
Ono, Y ;
Ohshima, S ;
Matsuda, T ;
Terachi, T ;
Yoshida, O .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :650-653
[13]  
Karayiannakis AJ, 1997, BRIT J SURG, V84, P467
[14]   LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL NEOPLASMS [J].
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
KERBL, K ;
CAPELOUTO, CC ;
MCDOUGALL, EM ;
CLAYMAN, RV .
UROLOGY, 1993, 42 (05) :603-609
[15]  
KLOOSTERMAN T, 1994, SURGERY, V115, P424
[16]   Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: The Washington University experience [J].
McDougall, EM ;
Clayman, RV ;
Elashry, OM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04) :1180-1185
[17]  
MCDOUGALL EM, 1996, ADULT PEDIAT UROLOGY, P829
[18]   Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: The Nagoya experience [J].
Ono, Y ;
Katoh, N ;
Kinukawa, T ;
Matsuura, O ;
Ohshima, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (03) :719-723
[19]   Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A five-year experience [J].
Ono, Y ;
Kinukawa, T ;
Hattori, R ;
Yamada, S ;
Nishiyama, N ;
Mizutani, K ;
Ohshima, S .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (02) :280-286
[20]  
Pearle Margaret S., 1996, P451