Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks

被引:233
作者
Siegrist, M
Earle, TC
Gutscher, H
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol Social Psychol 1, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Western Washington Univ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
[3] Univ Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
confidence; electromagnetic fields; mobile phone; risk perception; social trust;
D O I
10.1111/1539-6924.00349
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Trust is an important factor in risk management. There is little agreement among researchers, however, on how trust in risk management should be studied. Based on a comprehensive review of the trust literature a "dual-mode model of social trust and confidence" is proposed. Trust and confidence are separate but, under some circumstances, interacting sources of cooperation. Trust is based on value similarity, and confidence is based on performance. According to our model, judging similarity between an observer's currently active values and the values attributed to others determines social trust. Thus, the basis for trust is a judgment that the person to be trusted would act as the trusting person would. Interpretation of the other's performance influences confidence. Both social trust and confidence have an impact on people's willingness to cooperate (e.g., accept electromagnetic fields or ENIF in the neighborhood). The postulated model was tested in the applied context of ENIF risks. Structural equation modeling procedures and data from a random sample of 1,313 Swiss citizens between 18 and 74 years old were used. Results indicated that after minor modifications the model explained the data very well. In the applied context of ENIF risks, both trust and confidence had an impact on cooperation. Results suggest that the dual-mode model of social trust and confidence could be used as a common framework in the field of trust and risk management. Practical implications of the results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 716
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[41]  
Nissenbaum H, 2001, BOSTON U LAW REV, V81, P635
[42]   The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power [J].
Peters, E ;
Slovic, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 26 (16) :1427-1453
[43]   The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study [J].
Peters, RG ;
Covello, VT ;
McCallum, DB .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1997, 17 (01) :43-54
[44]   BIASES IN THE ASSIMILATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKDOWNS - DO ACCIDENTS MAKE US SAFER [J].
PLOUS, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 21 (13) :1058-1082
[46]  
Renn O., 1991, Communicating Risks to the Public, P175, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10
[47]  
Ribstein LE, 2001, BOSTON U LAW REV, V81, P553
[48]   INTERPERSONAL-TRUST, TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND GULLIBILITY [J].
ROTTER, JB .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (01) :1-7
[49]   A NEW SCALE FOR MEASUREMENT OF INTERPERSONAL TRUST [J].
ROTTER, JB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1967, 35 (04) :651-&
[50]   Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust [J].
Rousseau, DM ;
Sitkin, SB ;
Burt, RS ;
Camerer, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :393-404