Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer

被引:173
作者
Kerlikowske, K
Carney, PA
Geller, B
Mandelson, MT
Taplin, SH
Malvin, K
Ernster, V
Urban, N
Cutter, G
Rosenberg, R
Ballard-Barbash, R
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Dartmouth Med Sch, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] Ctr Canc Res, AMC, Denver, CO USA
[7] Univ New Mexico, Med Ctr, New Mexico Tumor Registry, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[8] Natl Canc Inst, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-133-11-200012050-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although it is recommended that women with a family history of breast cancer begin screening mammography at a younger age than average-risk women, few studies have evaluated the performance of mammography in this group. Objective: To compare the performance of screening mammography in women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer and women of similar age without such history. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Mammography registries in California (n = 1) New Hampshire (n = 1), New Mexico (n = 1), Vermont (n = 1) Washington State (n = 2), and Colorado (n = 1). Measurements: Risk factors for breast cancer; results of first screening examination captured for a woman by a registry; and any invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ identified by linkage to a pathology database, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, or a state tumor registry. Results: The number of cancer cases per 1000 examinations increased with age and was higher in women with a family history of breast cancer than in those without (3.2 vs. 1.6 for ages 30 to 39 years, 4.7 vs. 2.7 for ages 40 to 49 years, 6.6 vs. 4.6 for ages 50 to 59 years, and 9.3 vs. 6.9 for ages 60 to 69 years). The sensitivity of mammography increased significantly with age (P = 0.001 [chi-square test for trend]) in women with a family history and in those without (63.2% [95% CI, 41.5% to 84.8%] vs. 69.5% [Ct, 57.7% to 81.2%] for ages 30 to 39 years, 70.2% [CI, 61.0% to 79.5%] vs. 77.5% [CI, 73.3% to 81.8%] for ages 40 to 49 years, 81.3% [CI, 73.3% to 89.3%] vs. 80.2% [CI, 76.5% to 83.9%] for ages 50 to 59 years, and 83.8% [CI, 76.8% to 90.9%] vs. 87.7% [Cf, 84.8% to 90.7%] for ages 60 to 69 years). Sensitivity was similar for each decade of age regardless of family history. The positive predictive value of mammography was higher in women with a family history than in those without (3.7% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.001). Conclusions: Cancer detection rates in women who had a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer were similar to those in women a decade older without such a history. The sensitivity of screening mammography was influenced primarily by age.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 863
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] RENNERT G, 1999, PROGR BREAST CANC SC
  • [32] Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: Review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Rosenberg, RD
    Hunt, WC
    Williamson, MR
    Gilliland, FD
    Wiest, PW
    Kelsey, CA
    Key, CR
    Linver, MN
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) : 511 - 518
  • [33] MEDICAL AUDIT OF A RAPID-THROUGHPUT MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING PRACTICE - METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS OF 27,114 EXAMINATIONS
    SICKLES, EA
    OMINSKY, SH
    SOLLITTO, RA
    GALVIN, HB
    MONTICCIOLO, DL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (02) : 323 - 327
  • [34] A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF FAMILY HISTORY AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - THE UTAH POPULATION DATABASE
    SLATTERY, ML
    KERBER, RA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (13): : 1563 - 1568
  • [35] IS SURVIVAL AMONG WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH BREAST-CANCER INFLUENCED BY FAMILY HISTORY OF BREAST-CANCER
    SLATTERY, ML
    BERRY, TD
    KERBER, RA
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (06) : 543 - 548
  • [36] SPRATT JS, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P970
  • [37] Tabar L, 1997, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P43
  • [38] WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM INTERVAL BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING EXAMINATIONS - AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE LATEST RESULTS OF THE SWEDISH 2-COUNTY BREAST-CANCER SCREENING TRIAL
    TABAR, L
    FABERBERG, G
    DAY, NE
    HOLMBERG, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 55 (05) : 547 - 551
  • [39] TABAR L, 1995, CANCER, V75, P2507, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2507::AID-CNCR2820751017>3.0.CO
  • [40] 2-H