The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude

被引:171
作者
Durkin, Kelley [1 ]
Rittle-Johnson, Bethany [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Peabody Coll, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
Incorrect examples; Misconceptions; Conceptual and procedural knowledge; Mathematics learning; Comparison; WORKED EXAMPLES; PROCEDURAL FLEXIBILITY; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; MATHEMATICS; SKILL; COMPREHENSION; ERRORS; TEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Comparing common mathematical errors to correct examples may facilitate learning, even for students with limited prior domain knowledge. We examined whether studying incorrect and correct examples was more effective than studying two correct examples across prior knowledge levels. Fourth- and fifth-grade students (N = 74) learned about decimal magnitude in a brief tutoring session. Students were randomly assigned to two conditions: 1) comparing correct and incorrect examples (incorrect condition) or 2) comparing correct examples only (correct condition). The incorrect condition helped students learn correct procedures and key concepts more than the correct condition, including reducing misconceptions. Students' prior knowledge of decimals did not interact with condition. Students' explanations during the intervention revealed that those in the incorrect condition more frequently discussed correct concepts (e.g., the magnitude of a decimal and identifying misconceptions). Overall, contrasting incorrect examples with correct examples can help students learn correct concepts and procedures. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 214
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条