Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Cohort and Registry Studies

被引:155
作者
de Rooij, Thijs [1 ]
Lu, Martijn Z. [1 ]
Steen, Willemijn [2 ]
Gerhards, Michael F. [2 ]
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. [3 ]
Busch, Olivier R. [1 ]
Lips, Daan J. [4 ]
Festen, Sebastiaan [2 ]
Besselink, Marc G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Room G4-196, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam 22660, Netherlands
[2] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Clin Res Unit, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam 22660, Netherlands
[4] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Surg, Den Bosch, Netherlands
关键词
laparoscopy; minimally invasive; pancreatoduodenectomy; registry; robot-assisted; PYLORUS-PRESERVING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; ROBOT-ASSISTED PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATIC RESECTION; VASCULAR RESECTION; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001660
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to appraise and to evaluate the current evidence on minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy only in comparative cohort and registry studies. Background: Outcomes after MIPD seem promising, but most data come from single-center, noncomparative series. Methods: Comparative cohort and registry studies on MIPD versus open pancreatoduodenectomy published before August 23, 2015 were identified systematically and meta-analyses were performed. Primary endpoints were mortality and International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Results: After screening 2293 studies, 19 comparative cohort studies (1833 patients) with moderate methodological quality and 2 original registry studies (19,996 patients) were included. For cohort studies, the median annual hospital MIPD volume was 14. Selection bias was present for cancer diagnosis. No differences were found in mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-1.9] orPOPF [(OR) = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.8 to 1.3]. Publication biaswas present for POPF. MIPD was associated with prolonged operative times [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 74 minutes, 95% CI = 29-118], but lower intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -385mL, 95% CI = -616 to -154), less delayed gastric emptying (OR = 0.6, 95% = CI 0.5-0.8), and shorter hospital stay (WMD = -3 days, 95% CI = -5 to -2). For registry studies, the median annual hospital MIPD volume was 2.5. Mortality after MIPD was increased in low-volume hospitals (7.5% vs 3.4%; P = 0.003). Conclusions: Outcomes after MIPD seem promising in comparative cohort studies, despite the presence of bias, whereas registry studies report higher mortality in low-volume centers. The introduction of MIPD should be closely monitored and probably done only within structured training programs in high-volume centers.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 267
页数:11
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients
    Adam, Mohamed Abdelgadir
    Choudhury, Kingshuk
    Dinan, Michaela A.
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Scheri, Randall P.
    Blazer, Dan G., III
    Roman, Sanziana A.
    Sosa, Julie A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 372 - 377
  • [2] [Anonymous], INT J MED ROBOT
  • [3] [Anonymous], SURG ENDOSC
  • [4] [Anonymous], PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZ
  • [5] Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Stauffer, John A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (06) : 810 - 819
  • [6] Retrospective Comparison of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Neoplasms
    Bao, Philip Q.
    Mazirka, Pavel O.
    Watkins, Kevin T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (04) : 682 - 689
  • [7] Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
    Bassi, C
    Dervenis, C
    Butturini, G
    Fingerhut, A
    Yeo, C
    Izbicki, J
    Neoptolemos, J
    Sarr, M
    Traverso, W
    Buchler, M
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [8] Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Boggi, U.
    Signori, S.
    De Lio, N.
    Perrone, V. G.
    Vistoli, F.
    Belluomini, M.
    Cappelli, C.
    Amorese, G.
    Mosca, F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (07) : 917 - 925
  • [9] Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review
    Boggi, Ugo
    Amorese, Gabriella
    Vistoli, Fabio
    Caniglia, Fabio
    De Lio, Nelide
    Perrone, Vittorio
    Barbarello, Linda
    Belluomini, Mario
    Signori, Stefano
    Mosca, Franco
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (01): : 9 - 23
  • [10] Assessment of Quality Outcomes for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Identification of the Learning Curve
    Boone, Brian A.
    Zenati, Mazen
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Steve, Jennifer
    Moser, Arthur James
    Bartlett, David L.
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (05) : 416 - 422