Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins

被引:113
作者
Chen, HY [1 ]
Manhart, J [1 ]
Hickel, R [1 ]
Kunzelmann, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
polymerization contraction stress; stress development; packable composite; ORMOCER; hybrid composite;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00079-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Determination of the polymerization contraction stress of packable composites (ALERT, Surefil, Solitaire, Solitaire 2) and a packable ORMOCER material (Definite) in comparison with a conventional hybrid composite (Tetric Ceram). Methods: Contraction force generated by the test materials (10 replications each) was measured by polymerizing the composites filled in a plastic tray between two aluminum attachments mounted in a Stress-Strain-Analyzer testing machine (specimen size: 4 x 4 x 2 mm, C-factor = 0.33). Contraction force was recorded for 300 s under a standard exposure condition (40 s, 800 mW/cm(2)). Maximum contraction stress (MPa), force rate (N/s), relative force rate (%/s) of each material were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (alpha = 0.05) and post-hoc Tukey's test. Results: Maximum contraction stresses of the packable materials were 4.60 +/- 0.32 MPa (ALERT), 4.16 +/- 0.18 MPa (Definite), 3.35 +/- 0.08 MPa (Solitaire 2), 3.39 +/- 0.23 MPa (Solitaire) and 3.13 +/- 0.18 MPa (Surefil), which were significantly higher than that of Tetric Ceram (2.51 +/- 0.14 MPa). Tetric Ceram exhibited the significantly lowest force rate. Force/time curves were S-shaped. Solitaire especially showed a longer pre-gelation phase before contraction force was recorded. Significance: High contraction stress and rapid contraction force development can lead to failure of bond to tooth structure. This study suggested that, packable composite resins are less capable of reducing the contraction stress during the early setting stage, thus not superior in maintaining the bond with cavity walls to conventional hybrid composite Tetric Ceram. (C) 2001 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 259
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BAUSCH JR, 1982, J PROSTHET DENT, V48, P59, DOI 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90048-8
[2]  
Bouschlicher M R, 2000, J Esthet Dent, V12, P23, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00195.x
[3]   The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite [J].
Choi, KK ;
Condon, JR ;
Ferracane, JL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (03) :812-817
[4]   Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting [J].
Dauvillier, BS ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
De Gee, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (03) :818-823
[5]   RELAXATION OF POLYMERIZATION CONTRACTION STRESSES BY FLOW IN DENTAL COMPOSITES [J].
DAVIDSON, CL ;
DEGEE, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 (02) :146-148
[6]   Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives [J].
Davidson, CL ;
Feilzer, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (06) :435-440
[7]  
DEGEE AJ, 1979, QUINTESSENCE INT, V7, P69
[8]  
DULLIN P, 1998, THESIS U MUNICH, P32
[9]  
FARAH JW, 1998, DENT ADVISOR, V15, P1
[10]   SETTING STRESS IN COMPOSITE RESIN IN RELATION TO CONFIGURATION OF THE RESTORATION [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (11) :1636-1639