Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins

被引:113
作者
Chen, HY [1 ]
Manhart, J [1 ]
Hickel, R [1 ]
Kunzelmann, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
polymerization contraction stress; stress development; packable composite; ORMOCER; hybrid composite;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00079-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Determination of the polymerization contraction stress of packable composites (ALERT, Surefil, Solitaire, Solitaire 2) and a packable ORMOCER material (Definite) in comparison with a conventional hybrid composite (Tetric Ceram). Methods: Contraction force generated by the test materials (10 replications each) was measured by polymerizing the composites filled in a plastic tray between two aluminum attachments mounted in a Stress-Strain-Analyzer testing machine (specimen size: 4 x 4 x 2 mm, C-factor = 0.33). Contraction force was recorded for 300 s under a standard exposure condition (40 s, 800 mW/cm(2)). Maximum contraction stress (MPa), force rate (N/s), relative force rate (%/s) of each material were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (alpha = 0.05) and post-hoc Tukey's test. Results: Maximum contraction stresses of the packable materials were 4.60 +/- 0.32 MPa (ALERT), 4.16 +/- 0.18 MPa (Definite), 3.35 +/- 0.08 MPa (Solitaire 2), 3.39 +/- 0.23 MPa (Solitaire) and 3.13 +/- 0.18 MPa (Surefil), which were significantly higher than that of Tetric Ceram (2.51 +/- 0.14 MPa). Tetric Ceram exhibited the significantly lowest force rate. Force/time curves were S-shaped. Solitaire especially showed a longer pre-gelation phase before contraction force was recorded. Significance: High contraction stress and rapid contraction force development can lead to failure of bond to tooth structure. This study suggested that, packable composite resins are less capable of reducing the contraction stress during the early setting stage, thus not superior in maintaining the bond with cavity walls to conventional hybrid composite Tetric Ceram. (C) 2001 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 259
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   SETTING STRESSES IN COMPOSITES FOR 2 DIFFERENT CURING MODES [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1993, 9 (01) :2-5
[12]   QUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATION OF STRESS REDUCTION BY FLOW IN COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1990, 6 (03) :167-171
[13]   INFLUENCE OF LIGHT-INTENSITY ON POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE AND INTEGRITY OF RESTORATION-CAVITY INTERFACE [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DOOREN, LH ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1995, 103 (05) :322-326
[14]  
Friedl KH, 2000, OPER DENT, V25, P26
[15]  
Goracci G, 1996, QUINTESSENCE INT, V27, P355
[16]   Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives [J].
Labella, R ;
Lambrechts, P ;
Van Meerbeek, B ;
Vanherle, G .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1999, 15 (02) :128-137
[17]  
Leinfelder K F, 1999, J Esthet Dent, V11, P234, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00405.x
[18]   QUALITY AND DURABILITY OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION IN BONDED COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS [J].
LUTZ, F ;
KREJCI, I ;
BARBAKOW, F .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1991, 7 (02) :107-113
[19]   Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins [J].
Manhart, J ;
Kunzelmann, KH ;
Chen, HY ;
Hickel, R .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2000, 16 (01) :33-40
[20]   Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization' [J].
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Kunzelmann, KH .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (3-4) :321-330