Ozone exposure over two growing seasons alters root-to-shoot ratio and chemical composition of birch (Betula pendula Roth)

被引:84
作者
Yamaji, K
Julkunen-Tiitto, R
Rousi, M
Freiwald, V
Oksanen, E
机构
[1] Univ Kuopio, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Punkaharju Res Stn, FIN-58450 Punkaharju, Finland
[3] Univ Joensuu, Dept Biol, Nat Prod Res Labs, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
关键词
birch; defence; growth; ozone; phenolic; compounds;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00669.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Physiological and chemical responses of 17 birch (Betula pendula Roth) clones to 1.5-1.7 x ambient ozone were studied in an open-field experiment over two growing seasons. The saplings were studied for growth, foliar visible injuries, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll, carotenoid, Rubisco, total soluble protein, macronutrient and phenolic concentrations in leaves. Elevated ozone resulted in growth enhancement, changes in shoot-to-root (s/r) ratio, visible foliar injuries, reduced stomatal conductance, lower late-season net photosynthesis, foliar nutrient imbalance, changes in phenolic composition, and reductions in pigment, Rubisco and soluble protein contents indicating accelerated leaf senescence. Majority of clones responded to ozone by changing C allocation towards roots, by stomatal closure (reduced ozone uptake), and by investment in low-cost foliar antioxidants to avoid and tolerate ozone stress. A third of clones, showing increased s/r ratio, relied on inducible efficient high-cost antioxidants, and enhanced leaf production to compensate ozone-caused decline in leaf-level net photosynthesis. However, the best ozone tolerance was found in two s/r ratio-unaffected clones showing a high constitutive amount of total phenolics, investment in low-cost antioxidants and N distribution to leaves, and lower stomatal conductance under ozone stress. The results highlight the importance of phenolic compounds in ozone defence mechanisms in the birch population. Depending on the genotype, ozone detoxification was improved by an increase in either efficient high-cost or less efficient low-cost antioxidative phenolics, with close connections to whole-plant physiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1377
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Maurer S, 1997, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V12, P11
[22]   Physiological responses of birch (Betula pendula) to ozone:: a comparison between open-soil-grown trees exposed for six growing seasons and potted seedlings exposed for one season [J].
Oksanen, E .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 23 (09) :603-614
[23]   Differences of Betula origins in ozone sensitivity based on open-field experiment over two growing seasons [J].
Oksanen, E ;
Rousi, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2001, 31 (05) :804-811
[24]   Ozone exposure results in various carry-over effects and prolonged reduction in biomass in birch (Betula pendula Roth) [J].
Oksanen, E ;
Saleem, A .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 22 (11) :1401-1411
[25]   Responses of two birch (Betula pendula Roth) clones to different ozone profiles with similar AOT40 exposure [J].
Oksanen, E ;
Holopainen, T .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (31) :5245-5254
[26]   Physiological, stomatal and ultrastructural ozone responses in birch (Betula pendula Roth.) are modified by water stress [J].
Pääkkönen, E ;
Vahala, J ;
Pohjolai, M ;
Holopainen, T ;
Kärenlampi, L .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 21 (07) :671-684
[27]   The ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendula) in relation to the developmental stage of leaves [J].
Paakkonen, E ;
Metsarinne, S ;
Holopainen, T ;
Karenlampi, L .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1996, 132 (01) :145-154
[28]   Ozone-induced oxidative stress: Mechanisms of action and reaction [J].
Pell, EJ ;
Schlagnhaufer, CD ;
Arteca, RN .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1997, 100 (02) :264-273
[29]  
Podila G. K., 2001, The impact of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases on forest ecosystems. Report No.3 of the IUFRO task force on environmental change, P57, DOI 10.1079/9780851995519.0057
[30]  
Poorter H, 2000, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V27, P595, DOI 10.1071/PP99173