The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors

被引:137
作者
Park, Mi Jung [1 ]
Cha, Eun Suk [1 ]
Kang, Bong Joo [1 ]
Ihn, Yon Kwon [1 ]
Baik, Jun Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, St Vincent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Suwon 442723, South Korea
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging breast; MR breast; cancer detectability; LESIONS; CANCER; BENIGN; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.390
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: We wanted to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for detecting breast tumors, as compared with the T1- and T2-weighted images. Materials and Methods: Forty-one female patients underwent breast MRI, and this included the T1-, T2-, DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced images. Sixty-five enhancing lesions were detected on the dynamic contrast-enhanced images and we used this as a reference image for detecting tumor. Fifty-six breast lesions were detected on DWI and the histological diagnoses were as follows: 43 invasive ductal carcinomas, one mucinous carcinoma, one mixed infiltrative and mucinous carcinoma, seven ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and four benign tumors. First, we compared the detectability of breast lesions on DWI with that of the T1 - and T2-weighted images. We then compared the ADCs of the malignant and benign breast lesions to the ADCs of the normal fibroglandular tissue. Results: Fifty-six lesions were detected via DWI (detectability of 86.2%). The detectabilities of breast lesions on the T1 - and T2-weighted imaging were 61.5% (40/65) and 75.4% (49/65), respectively. The mean ADCs of the invasive ductal carcinoma (0.89 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second) and DCIS (1.17 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second) are significantly lower than those of the benign lesions (1.41 +/- 0.56 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second) and the normal fibroglandular tissue (1.51 +/- 0.29 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second). Conclusion: DWI has a high sensitivity for detecting breast tumors, and especially for detecting malignant breast tumors. DWI was an effective imaging technique for detecting breast lesions, as compared to using the T1- and T2-weighted images.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 396
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Bammer, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (03) :169-184
[2]   Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Chen, MH ;
DeAngelis, GA ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Harms, S ;
Heywang-Köbrunner, SH ;
Hylton, N ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Lehman, C ;
Pisano, ED ;
Causer, P ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Smazal, SF ;
Stelling, CB ;
Weatherall, PT ;
Schnall, MD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2735-2742
[3]  
Debruhl N D., 2005, Diagnosis of Diseases of the Breast, V2nd Editio, P225
[4]   Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Guo, Y ;
Cai, YQ ;
Cai, ZL ;
Gao, YG ;
An, NY ;
Ma, L ;
Mahankali, S ;
Gao, JH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :172-178
[5]   Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue [J].
Hosseinzadeh, K ;
Schwarz, SD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (04) :654-661
[6]   Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions [J].
Ichikawa, T ;
Haradome, H ;
Hachiya, J ;
Nitatori, T ;
Araki, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) :397-402
[7]  
Ikeda DM, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P975, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<975::AID-JMRI24>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-P
[9]   Benign and malignant breast lesions: Diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging [J].
Jacobs, MA ;
Barker, PB ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Maranto, C ;
Arnold, C ;
Herskovits, EH ;
Bhujwalla, Z .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :225-232
[10]   Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease [J].
Kim, T ;
Murakami, T ;
Takahashi, S ;
Hori, M ;
Tsuda, K ;
Nakamura, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (02) :393-398