Anorectal symptoms after various modes of vaginal delivery

被引:11
作者
Koops, SES
Vervest, HAM
Oostvogel, HJM
机构
[1] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol, NL-3816 CP Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] St Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] St Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
fecal incontinence; forceps delivery; vacuum delivery;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-003-1040-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of, and the changes in, anorectal symptoms following different modes of vaginal delivery in primiparous women. Six hundred and seventeen questionnaires were distributed to primiparous women 3-4 years after delivery. The questionnaires were designed to obtain information regarding the development of anorectal symptoms, including the type of symptoms experienced, their severity and their impact on lifestyle. A total of 479 questionnaires were returned, representing a response rate of 77.6%. Women included in the study were divided into three groups on the basis of the mode of delivery (normal vaginal, vacuum extraction and forceps). Any episode of fecal incontinence was considered to be abnormal. Following delivery, de novo incontinence developed in 22%. There was no significant difference between the three modes of vaginal delivery in terms of the development of fecal incontinence (normal vaginal delivery 22%, vacuum extraction 20%, forceps delivery 26%). Furthermore, analysis of obstetric variables could not identify one significant independent risk factor for anorectal incontinence. The results of this study suggest that instrumental vaginal deliveries are as safe as a normal vaginal delivery in terms of the development of anorectal symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 249
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BEK KM, 1992, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V99, P742
[2]   Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery [J].
de Leeuw, JW ;
Struijk, PC ;
Vierhout, ME ;
Wallenburg, HCS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (04) :383-387
[3]   Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study [J].
Fynes, M ;
Donnelly, V ;
Behan, M ;
O'Connell, PR ;
O'Herlihy, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9183) :983-986
[4]  
HADEEM K, 1988, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V27, P27
[5]   OBSTETRIC DAMAGE AND FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
KAMM, MA .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :730-733
[6]  
MACARTHUR C, 1997, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V104, P44
[7]   SPHINCTER DENERVATION IN ANORECTAL INCONTINENCE AND RECTAL PROLAPSE [J].
PARKS, AG ;
SWASH, M ;
URICH, H .
GUT, 1977, 18 (08) :656-665
[8]  
PARKS AG, 1975, P ROY SOC MED, V68, P21
[9]   Third degree obstetric perineal tears: Risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy [J].
Poen, AC ;
FeltBersma, RJF ;
Dekker, GA ;
Deville, W ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Meuwissen, SGM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (05) :563-566
[10]   THE ROLE OF PARTIAL DENERVATION OF THE PELVIC FLOOR IN THE ETIOLOGY OF GENITOURINARY PROLAPSE AND STRESS-INCONTINENCE OF URINE - A NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY [J].
SMITH, ARB ;
HOSKER, GL ;
WARRELL, DW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (01) :24-28