The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks

被引:660
作者
Toplak, Maggie E. [1 ]
West, Richard F. [2 ]
Stanovich, Keith E. [3 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Psychol, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] James Madison Univ, Dept Psychol, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Human Dev & Appl Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Cognitive reflection test; Rational thinking; Intelligence; Heuristics and biases; Thinking dispositions; DECISION-MAKING COMPETENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES APPROACH; SERIAL-ADDITION TASK; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; THINKING DISPOSITIONS; CONJUNCTION FALLACY; RATIONAL THOUGHT; ABILITY; PROBABILITY; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is designed to measure the tendency to override a prepotent response alternative that is incorrect and to engage in further reflection that leads to the correct response. In this study, we showed that the CRT is a more potent predictor of performance on a wide sample of tasks from the heuristics-and-biases literature than measures of cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and executive functioning. Although the CRT has a substantial correlation with cognitive ability, a series of regression analyses indicated that the CRT was a unique predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. It accounted for substantial additional variance after the other measures of individual differences had been statistically controlled. We conjecture that this is because neither intelligence tests nor measures of executive functioning assess the tendency toward miserly processing in the way that the CRT does. We argue that the CRT is a particularly potent measure of the tendency toward miserly processing because it is a performance measure rather than a self-report measure.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1289
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RATIONALITY REFLECTI, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195341140.003.0002
[12]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Rationality and Reasoning (Essays in Cognitive Psychology)
[13]   Progress in executive-function research: From tasks to functions to regions to networks [J].
Aron, Adam R. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (02) :124-129
[14]   OUTCOME BIAS IN DECISION EVALUATION [J].
BARON, J ;
HERSHEY, JC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 54 (04) :569-579
[15]   Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates [J].
Best, John R. ;
Miller, Patricia H. ;
Jones, Lara L. .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2009, 29 (03) :180-200
[16]   DIAGNOSTICITY AND PSEUDODIAGNOSTICITY [J].
BEYTHMAROM, R ;
FISCHHOFF, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 45 (06) :1185-1195
[17]  
Bishop M., 2005, EPISTEMOLOGY PSYCHOL
[18]   Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Petty, RE ;
Feinstein, JA ;
Blair, W ;
Jarvis, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (02) :197-253
[19]  
Campitelli G, 2010, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V5, P182
[20]  
Cokely ET, 2009, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V4, P20