Unified description and validation of Monte Carlo simulators in PET

被引:24
作者
Buvat, I [1 ]
Castiglioni, I
Feuardent, J
Gilardi, MC
机构
[1] CHU Pitie Salpetriere, INSERM, U494, Paris, France
[2] Univ Milan, CNR, INB, Inst HS Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/2/011
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Several Monte Carlo simulators are currently available for positron emission tomography (PET). Because each code has been described in a different way, it is difficult to know which one is best suited to a specific application. To help clarify the capabilities and accuracy of different codes dedicated to PET simulations, we propose a uniform description of the code features. This description specifies features pertaining to the models used for simulating the physics of PET and for describing a PET acquisition, to the acceleration strategies and to the technical characteristics of the code implementation. To assess the code accuracy, we suggest validation procedures based on NEMA phantoms involving standard physical parameters and simulation of a complex activity distribution. A test characterizing the statistical properties of detected coincidences is also described. The proposed code description and validation procedures are illustrated by considering the SimSET and PET-EGS codes. These codes differ in many features, including models for randoms and dead time, and source description. Despite these differences, both codes yielded data with properties close to those of real data. Depending on the intended application, one code might be preferred however. Indeed, only PET-EGS allows for accurate modelling of count rates while SimSET is more computationally efficient. The proposed code description and validation procedures might help determine which code is most appropriate for a specific application.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 346
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Adam LE, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P1821
[2]   A METHOD FOR MEASURING THE ABSOLUTE SENSITIVITY OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNERS [J].
BAILEY, DL ;
JONES, T ;
SPINKS, TJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1991, 18 (06) :374-379
[3]  
Buvat I, 2002, Q J NUCL MED, V46, P48
[4]  
Castiglioni I, 2002, IEEE T NUCL SCI, V49, P2297, DOI [10.1109/TNS.2002.803686, 10.1109/TNS.2001803686]
[5]   Scatter correction techniques in 3D PET: A Monte Carlo evaluation [J].
Castiglioni, I ;
Cremonesi, O ;
Gilardi, MC ;
Bettinardi, V ;
Rizzo, G ;
Savi, A ;
Bellotti, E ;
Fazio, F .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1999, 46 (06) :2053-2058
[6]  
HARRISON RL, 1993, C REC NUCL SCI S, V2, P1154
[7]  
HARRISON RL, 2002, C REC IEEE NUCL SCI, V3, P1835
[8]   THE USE OF IMPORTANCE SAMPLING TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF PHOTON TRACKING IN EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY SIMULATIONS [J].
HAYNOR, DR ;
HARRISON, RL ;
LEWELLEN, TK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (05) :990-1001
[9]  
HAYNOR DR, 1998, VARIANCE REDUCTION T, P13
[10]   GATE:: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT [J].
Jan, S ;
Santin, G ;
Strul, D ;
Staelens, S ;
Assié, K ;
Autret, D ;
Avner, S ;
Barbier, R ;
Bardiès, M ;
Bloomfield, PM ;
Brasse, D ;
Breton, V ;
Bruyndonckx, P ;
Buvat, I ;
Chatziioannou, AF ;
Choi, Y ;
Chung, YH ;
Comtat, C ;
Donnarieix, D ;
Ferrer, L ;
Glick, SJ ;
Groiselle, CJ ;
Guez, D ;
Honore, PF ;
Kerhoas-Cavata, S ;
Kirov, AS ;
Kohli, V ;
Koole, M ;
Krieguer, M ;
van der Laan, DJ ;
Lamare, F ;
Largeron, G ;
Lartizien, C ;
Lazaro, D ;
Maas, MC ;
Maigne, L ;
Mayet, F ;
Melot, F ;
Merheb, C ;
Pennacchio, E ;
Perez, J ;
Pietrzyk, U ;
Rannou, FR ;
Rey, M ;
Schaart, DR ;
Schmidtlein, CR ;
Simon, L ;
Song, TY ;
Vieira, JM ;
Visvikis, D .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (19) :4543-4561