Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems

被引:327
作者
Dill, DD [1 ]
Soo, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Publ Policy, Res Program Publ Policy Acad Qual PPAQ, Abernethy Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
academic quality; higher education policy; league tables; organizational report cards; university rankings;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The global expansion of access to higher education has increased demand for information on academic quality and has led to the development of university ranking systems or league tables in many countries of the world. A recent UNESCO/CEPES conference oil higher education indicators concluded that cross-national research oil these ranking systems could mal e an important contribution to improving the international market for higher education. The comparison and analysis of national university ranking systems can help address a number of important policy questions. First, is there ail emerging international consensus oil the measurement of academic quality as reflected in these ranking systems? Second, what impact are the different ranking systems having oil university and academic behavior in their respective countries? Finally, are there important public interests that are thus far not reflected in these rankings? If so, is there a needed and appropriate role for public policy in the development and distribution of university ranking systems and what might that role be? This paper explores these questions through a comparative analysis Of university rankings ill Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 533
页数:39
相关论文
共 63 条
[31]  
HOSSLER D, 1993, MAPPING HIGHER ED LA
[32]  
JAMES R, 1999, U FACTORS INFLUENCIN
[33]  
Koelman J., 2001, Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right, P101
[34]  
Kuh G.D., 2003, CHANGE, V35, DOI DOI 10.1080/00091380309604090
[35]  
LARSEN K, 2002, OECD FOR TRAD ED SER
[36]  
Manski C.F., 1983, College choice in America
[37]   College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? [J].
McDonough, PM ;
Antonio, AL ;
Walpole, M ;
Perez, LX .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 39 (05) :513-537
[38]  
Monks J., 1999, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, V31, P42, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909604232, DOI 10.1080/00091389909604232]
[39]  
Moogan Y.J., 1999, Higher Education Quarterly, V53, P211, DOI [10.1111/1468-2273.00127, DOI 10.1111/1468-2273.00127]
[40]  
Morrison H. G., 1995, Higher Education Quarterly, V49, P128, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-2273.1995.tb01671.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2273.1995.TB01671.X]