Collaborative product and market development: Theoretical implications and experimental evidence

被引:39
作者
Amaldoss, W [1 ]
Rapoport, A
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Eller Sch Business, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
new product research; alliances; experimental economics; game theory; two-stage competition;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1040.0105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In alliances jointly developing product and market, we first investigate how (a) the number of networks competing to develop a product, (b) the number of alternative technology platforms, and (c) market sensitivity to product development expenditures affect investments of partnering firms. We find that, in equilibrium, when the number of either competing networks or technologies increases, investments are more likely to be directed toward market, rather than product, development. Second, we consider the case in which firms continue to jointly develop a product but compete individually in the market. Our analysis suggests that forcing alliance partners to compete individually might not attenuate the underinvestment problem associated with new product alliances. Third, we extend the model to consider sequential market entry with rewards based on the order of entry, technology spillover, endogenous market size, and asymmetric technologies. Finally, key predictions of the basic model are tested in two experiments. The aggregate results provide strong support to the qualitative implications of the equilibrium solution but only mixed support to its quantitative predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 414
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects [J].
Amaldoss, W ;
Jain, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (01) :30-42
[2]   David vs. Goliath: An analysis of asymmetric mixed-strategy games and experimental evidence [J].
Amaldoss, W ;
Jain, S .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (08) :972-991
[3]   Collaborating to compete [J].
Amaldoss, W ;
Meyer, RJ ;
Raju, JS ;
Rapoport, A .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2000, 19 (02) :105-126
[4]  
AMALDOSS W, 2005, EXPT BUSINESS RES, V2
[5]   The design of rent-seeking competitions: Committees, preliminary and final contests [J].
Amegashie, JA .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1999, 99 (1-2) :63-76
[6]   Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates [J].
Amir, R ;
Evstigneev, I ;
Wooders, J .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2003, 42 (02) :183-207
[7]   The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games [J].
Baye, MR ;
Hoppe, HC .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2003, 44 (02) :217-226
[8]  
BAYUS B, 1997, J MARKETING RES, V84, P50
[9]  
BOOZ A., 1982, NEW PRODUCTS MANAGEM
[10]   Sustainable pioneering advantage? Profit implications of market entry order [J].
Boulding, W ;
Christen, M .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2003, 22 (03) :371-392