The role of hydrological modelling uncertainties in climate change impact assessments of Irish river catchments

被引:198
作者
Bastola, Satish [1 ]
Murphy, Conor [1 ]
Sweeney, John [1 ]
机构
[1] NUIM, Dept Geog, ICARUS, Maynooth, Kildare, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Climate change; Rainfall-runoff model; Uncertainty; GLUE; BMA; Ireland; TOPMODEL; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; PREDICTIONS; SENSITIVITY; PARAMETERS; EVOLUTION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.008
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This study attempts to assess the uncertainty in the hydrological impacts of climate change using a multi-model approach combining multiple emission scenarios, GCMs and conceptual rainfall-runoff models to quantify uncertainty in future impacts at the catchment scale. The uncertainties associated with hydrological models have traditionally been given less attention in impact assessments until relatively recently. In order to examine the role of hydrological model uncertainty (parameter and structural uncertainty) in climate change impact studies a multi-model approach based on the Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) methods is presented. Six sets of regionalised climate scenarios derived from three GCMs, two emission scenarios, and four conceptual hydrological models were used within the GLUE framework to define the uncertainty envelop for future estimates of stream flow, while the GLUE output is also post processed using BMA, where the probability density function from each model at any given time is modelled by a gamma distribution with heteroscedastic variance. The investigation on four Irish catchments shows that the role of hydrological model uncertainty is remarkably high and should therefore be routinely considered in impact studies. Although, the GLUE and BMA approaches used here differ fundamentally in their underlying philosophy and representation of error, both methods show comparable performance in terms of ensemble spread and predictive coverage. Moreover, the median prediction for future stream flow shows progressive increases of winter discharge and progressive decreases in summer discharge over the coming century. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 576
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[32]   What do we mean by 'uncertainty"? The need for a consistent wording about uncertainty assessment in hydrology [J].
Montanari, Alberto .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2007, 21 (06) :841-845
[33]   A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles [J].
Murphy, J. M. ;
Booth, B. B. B. ;
Collins, M. ;
Harris, G. R. ;
Sexton, D. M. H. ;
Webb, M. J. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1857) :1993-2028
[34]  
Najafi M. R., 2010, Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 16-20 May, 2010, P81
[35]   SENSITIVITY OF WATER-RESOURCE SYSTEMS TO CLIMATE VARIATION [J].
NEMEC, J ;
SCHAAKE, J .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1982, 27 (03) :327-343
[36]  
NEW M., 2000, Integr. Assess, V1, P203, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1019144202120
[37]   Uncertainty and climate change impact on the flood regime of small UK catchments [J].
Prudhomme, C ;
Jakob, D ;
Svensson, C .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 277 (1-2) :1-23
[38]  
Prudhomme C., 2007, Climatic and anthropogenic impacts on the variability of water resources, P183
[39]   Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles [J].
Raftery, AE ;
Gneiting, T ;
Balabdaoui, F ;
Polakowski, M .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (05) :1155-1174
[40]   A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error [J].
Refsgaard, Jens Christian ;
van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. ;
Brown, James ;
van der Keur, Peter .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (11) :1586-1597