Analysis of macular thickness in British population using optical coherence tomography (OCT): An emphasis on interocular symmetry

被引:46
作者
El-Ashry, Mohamed [1 ]
Hegde, Vijay [1 ]
James, Peter [2 ]
Pagliarini, Sergio [2 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Eye Pavil, Edinburgh EH3 9HA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Hosp Coventry NHS Trust, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
fovea; macula; normal values; optical coherence tomography; retina;
D O I
10.1080/02713680802323140
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate macular thickness measurements in normal subjects from British origin, to assess interocular asymmetry using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to establish standard values for macular and foveal thickness. Methods: Two hundred eyes of 100 normal individuals underwent serial scans using fast macular thickness map protocol in the Stratus OCT version 3.51, with foveal fixation. Minimum foveal thickness (MFT), central 1 mm average foveal thickness (AFT), total foveal volume (TFV) and total macular volume (TMV at 6 mm) of both eyes were assessed. The interocular asymmetry was measured and statistically analyzed. Results: The mean +/- SD (N = 200) was 173 +/- 23 mu m for MFT and 203 +/- 24 mu m for AFT. The mean difference +/- SD between the two eyes was (3.5 +/- 14.5 mu m at p = 0.17) for MFT, (6.4 +/- 14.7 mu m at p = 0.06) for AFT, (0.007 mm3 +/- 0.007 at p = 0.06) for TFV and (0.19 +/- 0.35 at p = 0.07) for TMV. Conclusion: Our study provides a normative database for macular thickness and volume parameters in normal British individuals using Stratus OCT. The MFT, AFT, TMV and TFV measurements were not statistically significant between the two eyes. Hence, the interocular symmetry should be considered on interpretation of macular thickness values especially in cases of uniocular or asymmetrical macular involvement.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V98, P741
[2]  
Asefzadeh B, 2007, OPTOMETRY VISION SCI, V84, P941
[3]  
Baumann M, 1998, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V29, P280
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]  
British Standards Institution, 1975, 597 BSI 1
[6]   Detection of diabetic foveal edema - Contact lens biomicroscopy compared with optical coherence tomography [J].
Brown, JC ;
Solomon, SD ;
Bressler, SB ;
Schachat, AP ;
DiBernardo, C ;
Bressler, NM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 122 (03) :330-335
[7]   Interobserver variability in optical coherence tomography for macular [J].
Browning, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 137 (06) :1116-1117
[8]   Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using stratus optical coherence tomography [J].
Chan, A ;
Duker, JS ;
Ko, TH ;
Fujimoto, JG ;
Schuman, JS .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 124 (02) :193-198
[9]   Quantification of photoreceptor layer thickness in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography [J].
Chan, Annie ;
Duker, Jay S. ;
Ishikawa, Hiroshi ;
Ko, Tony H. ;
Schuman, Joel S. ;
Fujimoto, James G. .
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2006, 26 (06) :655-660
[10]   Optical coherence tomography 3: Delineation of the outer neural retinal boundary and its influence on retinal thickness measurements [J].
Costa, RA ;
Calucci, D ;
Skaf, M ;
Cardillo, JA ;
Castro, JC ;
Melo, LA ;
Martins, MC ;
Kaiser, PK .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (07) :2399-2406