Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis

被引:212
作者
Dien, J [1 ]
Spencer, KM
Donchin, E
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2003年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
P300; novelty P3; inverse problem; event related potential; electroencephalography;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00188-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recent research indicates that novel stimuli elicit at least two distinct components, the Novelty P3 and the P300. The P300 is thought to be elicited when a context updating mechanism is activated by a wide class of deviant events. The functional significance of the Novelty P3 is uncertain. Identification of the generator sources of the two components could provide additional information about their functional significance. Previous localization efforts have yielded conflicting results. The present report demonstrates that the use of principal components analysis (PCA) results in better convergence with knowledge about functional neuroanatomy than did previous localization efforts. The results are also more convincing than that obtained by two alternative methods, MUSIC-RAP and the Minimum Norm. Source modeling on 129-channel data with BESA and BrainVoyager suggests the P300 has sources in the temporal-parietal junction whereas the Novelty P3 has sources in the anterior cingulate. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 650
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Toward a dynamic topographic components model [J].
Achim, A ;
Bouchard, S .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 103 (03) :381-385
[2]   Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Misallocation of variance revisited [J].
Achim, A ;
Marcantoni, W .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (05) :597-606
[3]   METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION OF SPATIOTEMPORAL SOURCE MODELS [J].
ACHIM, A ;
RICHER, F ;
STHILAIRE, JM .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 79 (03) :227-240
[4]   Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex:: Magnetoencephalographic recordings [J].
Alho, K ;
Winkler, I ;
Escera, C ;
Huotilainen, M ;
Virtanen, J ;
Jääskeläinen, IP ;
Pekkonen, E ;
Ilmoniemi, RJ .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 35 (02) :211-224
[5]  
ALLPORT A, 1993, ATTENTION PERFORM, V14, P183
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions
[7]   Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain activity in the visual oddball task [J].
Ardekani, BA ;
Choi, SJ ;
Hossein-Zadeh, GA ;
Porjesz, B ;
Tanabe, JL ;
Lim, KO ;
Bilder, R ;
Helpern, JA ;
Begleiter, H .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (03) :347-356
[8]   INTRACEREBRAL POTENTIALS TO RARE TARGET AND DISTRACTER AUDITORY AND VISUAL-STIMULI .3. FRONTAL-CORTEX [J].
BAUDENA, P ;
HALGREN, E ;
HEIT, G ;
CLARKE, JM .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 94 (04) :251-264
[9]  
Berg P, 1999, EEG CL N SU, P189
[10]   A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects:: behavioral and event-related indices [J].
Berti, S ;
Schröger, E .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (03) :265-273