MTBE in drinking water production - Occurrence and efficiency of treatment technologies

被引:30
作者
Baus, C
Hung, H
Sacher, F
Fleig, M
Brauch, HJ
机构
[1] DVGW Technol Zentrum Wasser, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA | 2005年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
aeration; GAC adsorption; ozonation; AOP; riverbank filtration;
D O I
10.1002/aheh.200300562
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In Germany, the gasoline additive methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) is almost constantly detected in measurable concentrations in surface waters and is not significantly removed during riverbank filtration. The removal of MTBE from water has been the focus of many studies that mostly were performed at high concentration levels and centred in understanding the mechanisms of elimination. In order to assess the performance of conventional and advanced water treatment technologies for MTBE removal in the low concentration range further studies were undertaken. Laboratory experiments included aeration, granulated activated carbon (GAC) adsorption, ozonation and advanced oxidation processes (AOP). The results show that the removal of MTBE by conventional technologies is not easily achieved. MTBE is only removed by aeration at high expense. Ozonation at neutral pH values did not prove to be effective in eliminating MTBE at all. The use of ozone/H2O2 (AOP) may lead to a partly elimination of MTBE. However, the ozone/H2O2 concentrations required for a complete removal of MTBE from natural waters is much higher than the ozone levels applied nowadays in waterworks. MTBE is only poorly adsorbed on activated carbon, thus GAC filtration is not efficient in eliminating MTBE. A comparison with real-life data from German waterworks reveals that if MTBE is detected in the raw water it is most often found in the corresponding drinking water as well due to the poor removal efficiency of conventional treatment steps.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 132
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   MTBE oxidation by conventional ozonation and the combination ozone/hydrogen peroxide: Efficiency of the processes and bromate formation [J].
Acero, JL ;
Haderlein, SB ;
Schmidt, TC ;
Suter, MJF ;
Von Gunten, U .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (21) :4252-4259
[2]   Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in urban and rural precipitation in Germany [J].
Achten, C ;
Kolb, A ;
Püttmann, W .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (36) :6337-6345
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NWRI9906
[4]  
Atkins P. W., 1990, PHYS CHEM
[5]  
BACHLE A, 1995, DVGW SCHRIFTENREIHE, V87
[6]   DETERMINATION OF OZONE IN WATER BY THE INDIGO METHOD [J].
BADER, H ;
HOIGNE, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1981, 15 (04) :449-456
[7]   Efficiency of ozonation and AOP for methyl-tert-butylether (MTBE) removal in waterworks [J].
Baus, C ;
Sacher, F ;
Brauch, HJ .
OZONE-SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2005, 27 (01) :27-35
[8]  
BAUS C, 2000, W1100 DVGW
[9]  
DELLEITNER K, 1994, OZONE-SCI ENG, V16, P41
[10]  
EFFENBERGER M, 2001, GRUNDWASSER, V2, P51