Effect of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Mortality in Norway

被引:355
作者
Kalager, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Zelen, Marvin [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Langmark, Froydis [1 ]
Adami, Hans-Olov [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
COMPLETENESS; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1000727
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND A challenge in quantifying the effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality is to provide valid comparison groups. The use of historical control subjects does not take into account chronologic trends associated with advances in breast-cancer awareness and treatment. METHODS The Norwegian breast-cancer screening program was started in 1996 and expanded geographically during the subsequent 9 years. Women between the ages of 50 and 69 years were offered screening mammography every 2 years. We compared the incidence-based rates of death from breast cancer in four groups: two groups of women who from 1996 through 2005 were living in counties with screening (screening group) or without screening (nonscreening group); and two historical-comparison groups that from 1986 through 1995 mirrored the current groups. RESULTS We analyzed data from 40,075 women with breast cancer. The rate of death was reduced by 7.2 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the screening group as compared with the historical screening group (rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.81) and by 4.8 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the nonscreening group as compared with the historical nonscreening group (rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.93; P<0.001 for both comparisons), for a relative reduction in mortality of 10% in the screening group (P = 0.13). Thus, the difference in the reduction in mortality between the current and historical groups that could be attributed to screening alone was 2.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years, or a third of the total reduction of 7.2 deaths. CONCLUSIONS The availability of screening mammography was associated with a reduction in the rate of death from breast cancer, but the screening itself accounted for only about a third of the total reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1210
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Statistics Norway
[2]   Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cronin, KA ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Fryback, DG ;
Clarke, L ;
Zelen, M ;
Mandelblatt, JS ;
Yakovlev, AY ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Feuer, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1784-1792
[3]   Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality [J].
Blanks, RG ;
Moss, SM ;
McGahan, CE ;
Quinn, MJ ;
Babb, PJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262) :665-669
[4]   ANALYSIS OF BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY AND STAGE DISTRIBUTION BY AGE FOR THE HEALTH-INSURANCE PLAN CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
CHU, KC ;
SMART, CR ;
TARONE, RE .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1988, 80 (14) :1125-1132
[5]  
*CONS COUNC NORW, CONS REP 4 2002
[6]   Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography:: 1.: Further confirmation with extended data [J].
Duffy, SW ;
Tabár, L ;
Chen, THH ;
Smith, RA ;
Holmberg, L ;
Jonsson, H ;
Lenner, P ;
Nyström, L ;
Törnberg, S .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (01) :45-51
[7]  
ERZAAS A, 2003, QUALITY ASSURANCE MA
[8]   THE ROGERS,WILL PHENOMENON - STAGE MIGRATION AND NEW DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES AS A SOURCE OF MISLEADING STATISTICS FOR SURVIVAL IN CANCER [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
SOSIN, DM ;
WELLS, CK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (25) :1604-1608
[9]   Screening for breast cancer with mammography [J].
Gotzsche, P. C. ;
Nielsen, M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04)
[10]  
Hakama M, 1997, BRIT MED J, V314, P864