Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes

被引:183
作者
Bianchi, P. P. [1 ]
Ceriani, C. [1 ]
Locatelli, A. [1 ]
Spinoglio, G. [2 ]
Zampino, M. G. [3 ]
Sonzogni, A. [4 ]
Crosta, C. [5 ]
Andreoni, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, European Inst Oncol, Div Gen & Laparoscop Surg, Unit Minimally Invas Surg, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] SS Antonio & Biagio Hosp, Dept Surg, I-15010 Alessandria, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Div Med Oncol, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, European Inst Oncol, Div Pathol, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[5] European Inst Oncol, Div Endoscopy, I-20141 Milan, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 24卷 / 11期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Total mesorectal excision; Robotic surgery; Laparoscopic rectal resection; Robotic rectal resection; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; ASSISTED SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-1134-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed feasibility, short-term oncologic safety, and short-term outcomes in robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) for rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic TME. From March 2008 to June 2009, 50 patients with proven middle/lower rectal adenocarcinoma underwent minimally invasive TME; 25 received R-TME. The groups were balanced (R-TME versus L-TME) in terms of age (median 69 versus 62 years; p = 0.8), disease stage, and body mass index (median 23 versus 26.5 kg/m(2); p = 0.06). There were 37 (74%) anterior resections and 13 (26%) abdominoperineal resections. Twenty-three (46%) patients received preoperative radiochemotherapy. The robot was a four-arm Da Vinci S (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Median operating time (R-TME versus L-TME) was 240 versus 237 min (p = 0.2); first bowel movement was 2 versus 3 days (p = 0.5); median hospital stay was 6.5 versus 6 days (p = 0.4). Major complications with reoperation were two in R-TME (one anastomotic leakage, one small bowel perforation) and three in L-TME (one colonic ischemia, two anastomotic leakage). Postoperative complications were 16% versus 24% (p = 0.5). A median of 18 versus 17 (p = 0.7) lymph nodes were retrieved; distal resection margins were disease free in both groups; circumferential margin was involved (< 1.0 mm) in one (4%) of L-TME. There were 0 versus 1 (5%) conversions to laparotomy. R-TME in rectal cancer is feasible, with short-term oncologic and other outcomes similar to those of L-TME. The greater maneuverability and visibility afforded by the robotic approach are attractive. Future studies should more systematically address advantages and costs of R-TME.
引用
收藏
页码:2888 / 2894
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study [J].
Baik, Seung Hyuk ;
Kwon, Hye Youn ;
Kim, Jin Soo ;
Hur, Hyuk ;
Sohn, Seung Kook ;
Cho, Chang Hwan ;
Kim, Hoguen .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) :1480-1487
[2]   Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer -: Outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature [J].
Bärlehner, E ;
Benhidjeb, T ;
Anders, S ;
Schicke, B .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (06) :757-766
[3]   Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: A prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes [J].
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro ;
Rosati, Riccardo ;
Bona, Stefano ;
Rottoli, Matteo ;
Elmore, Ugo ;
Ceriani, Chiara ;
Malesci, Alberto ;
Montorsi, Marco .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (12) :2047-2053
[4]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[5]   The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma [J].
Bretagnol, F ;
Lelong, B ;
Laurent, C ;
Moutardier, V ;
Rullier, A ;
Monges, G ;
Delpero, JR ;
Rullier, E .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (07) :892-896
[6]   Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Breukink, S. ;
Pierie, J. ;
Wiggers, T. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04)
[7]   Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Manoj B. ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) :1428-1435
[8]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726
[9]   Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Hellan, Minia ;
Anderson, Casandra ;
Ellenhorn, Joshua D. I. ;
Paz, Benjamin ;
Pigazzi, Alessio .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (11) :3168-3173
[10]   Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization [J].
Hellan, Minia ;
Stein, Hubert ;
Pigazzi, Alessio .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (02) :447-451