Methodologic issues in low back pain research in primary care

被引:93
作者
Bouter, LM [1 ]
van Tulder, MW [1 ]
Koes, BW [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Fac Med, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
classification; low back pain; methodology; outcome measures; primary care; study design;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199809150-00019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Narrative review and discussion of the selected literature. Objectives. To discuss some important methodologic challenges in low back pain research in primary care. Summary of Background Data. Many methodologic problems must be confronted when conducting low back pain research. Some of these problems are back pain specific or specific to the primary care setting. Methods. Methodologic problems related to four research issues wilt be discussed: study designs, definition of low back pain, determinants of low back pain, and outcome assessment. Results. Two fundamentally different study designs are frequently used in low back pain research, namely observational studies and experimental studies. The definition of low back pain is typically restricted to a highly variable self-reported symptom, the sensation of pain in the back. There clearly is a need for an evidence-based classification system for low back pain. Because a tenable theoretical framework is lacking, it is difficult to know which determinants of low back pain should be quantified. Low back pain studies focus usually on health-related quality-of-life outcome parameters. The identification of the minimum clinically relevant changes for the most important outcome instruments needs further consideration. Conclusions. In years to come, low back pain researchers are challenged to overcome some of these (and other) problems to enhance the quality of low back pain research in primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:2014 / 2020
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [41] ON THE ACCURACY OF HISTORY, PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION, AND ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION-RATE IN DIAGNOSING LOW-BACK-PAIN IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - A CRITERIA-BASED REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    VANDENHOOGEN, HMM
    KOES, BW
    VANEIJK, JTM
    BOUTER, LM
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (03) : 318 - 327
  • [42] VANDENHOOGEN JMM, 1996, LOW BACK PAIN GEN PR, P47
  • [43] VANHOOGEN HJM, 1997, J FAM PRACTICE, V44, P187
  • [44] Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions
    vanTulder, MW
    Koes, BW
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (18) : 2128 - 2156
  • [45] Spinal radiographic findings and nonspecific low back pain - A systematic review of observational studies
    vanTulder, MW
    Assendelft, WJJ
    Koes, BW
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (04) : 427 - 434
  • [46] A COST-OF-ILLNESS STUDY OF BACK PAIN IN THE NETHERLANDS
    VANTULDER, MW
    KOES, BW
    BOUTER, LM
    [J]. PAIN, 1995, 62 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [47] Management of chronic nonspecific low back pain in primary care: A descriptive study
    vanTulder, MW
    Koes, BW
    Bouter, LM
    Metsemakers, JFM
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [48] EFFECTS OF PRACTICE STYLE IN MANAGING BACK PAIN
    VONKORFF, M
    BARLOW, W
    CHERKIN, D
    DEYO, RA
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (03) : 187 - 195
  • [49] The course of back pain in primary care
    VonKorff, M
    Saunders, K
    [J]. SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) : 2833 - 2837
  • [50] VONKORFF M, 1994, SPINE, V19, pS2041