Genetic education and nongenetic health professionals: Educational providers and curricula in Europe

被引:26
作者
Challen, K
Harris, HJ
Julian-Reymer, C
ten Kate, LP
Kristoffersson, U
Nippert, I
Schmidtke, J
Benjamin, C
Harris, R
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Med, GenEd Coordinating Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[2] INSERM 379, Inst Ctr Reg Lutte Canc, Marseille, France
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet & Human Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Human Genet Frauengesundheitsforsch, Munster, Germany
[6] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Human Genet, Hannover, Germany
关键词
genetics; Europe; education; undergraduate; postgraduate; paramedical;
D O I
10.1097/01.GIM.0000164562.18306.71
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Advances in and diffusion of genetic technology mean that nongeneticist health professionals have an increasing need to develop and maintain genetic competencies. This has been recognized by patient support groups and the European Commission. As the first phase of the GenEd (Genetic Education for Nongenetic Health Professionals) project, we investigated health professional education at undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing levels in terms of genetic content and delivery. Methods: Information was collected in the five GenEd partner countries (France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK) by reviewing published curricula and web sites and by directly contacting educational and regulatory organizations. Information was also requested from a further six South and East European collaborators (Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, and Spain). Results: Health professional education and training differed in structure with wide variation in the content and duration of genetic education provided. France and Germany have national undergraduate medical curricula but with minimal overt genetic content, mainly confined to basic science courses. In Sweden, Netherlands, and the UK, the content is largely at the discretion of individual universities. Evidence from the UK, France, and Germany indicates that genetic professionals are influencing the genetic content of medical curricula. In postgraduate training, some specialist regulators have adopted specific genetic educational requirements, but many programs lack any explicit genetics. Within each country many organizations have responsibility for setting, assessing, and delivering medical and midwifery education. Conclusions: Due to the multiplicity of organizations involved in the provision of genetic education, changing professional education is likely to be challenging. However, it may be that development of a multiprofessional consensus across Europe is achievable. The strategy adopted by the US National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics may be helpful.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 310
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 25 RECOMMENDATIONS E
[2]   Comparison of activities and attitudes of general practitioners concerning genetic counseling over a 10-year time-span [J].
Baars, MJH ;
de Smit, DJ ;
Langendam, MW ;
Adèr, HJ ;
ten Kate, LP .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (02) :145-149
[3]   Colorectal cancer screening and familial risk: A survey of internal medicine residents' knowledge and practice patterns [J].
Barrison, AF ;
Smith, C ;
Oviedo, J ;
Heeren, T ;
Schroy, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (06) :1410-1416
[4]  
Batra S, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P729
[5]  
*BRIT SOC HUM GEN, 2003, TEACH MED GEN UND ME
[6]  
BURTON H, 2003, ADDRESSING GENETICS
[7]  
Calzone Kathleen A, 2002, Oncol Nurs Forum, V29, P1327, DOI 10.1188/02.ONF.1327-1333
[8]  
Department of Health, 2003, OUR INH OUR FUT
[9]  
*GMC, 2003, TOM DOCT
[10]   Provision of genetic services in Europe:: current practices and issues [J].
Godard, B ;
Kääriäinen, H ;
Kristoffersson, U ;
Tranebjaerg, L ;
Coviello, D ;
Aymé, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 11 (Suppl 2) :S13-S48