Comparison of activities and attitudes of general practitioners concerning genetic counseling over a 10-year time-span

被引:10
作者
Baars, MJH [1 ]
de Smit, DJ
Langendam, MW
Adèr, HJ
ten Kate, LP
机构
[1] VU Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Clin Genet & Human Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] HC Projects Serv Consultancy, Res & Dev Hlth Care Projects, Baambrugge, Netherlands
[3] VU Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
general practitioner; genetic counseling; activities; attitudes;
D O I
10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00123-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the activities and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) concerning genetic counseling have changed between 1989 and 1999. In 1989 a random sample of 124 GPs in The Netherlands was selected. Of these GPs, 98 were contacted again in 1999 and 71 completed the questionnaire. The study showed an increase in the percentage of GPs who provided genetic counseling when a risk factor for having a child with a congenital disorder was present and known. In both 1989 and 1999, the GPs seldom used a recommended combination of oral and written information, and only data that was available in the databases on the risk indicator 'use of medication' increased over the years. GPs are still supporters of a directive method of counseling, and seem to believe that the main goal of genetic counseling is to prevent hereditary and congenital disorders. Although, between 1989 and 1999 more GPs provided genetic counseling when a risk indicator was present and known or referred to a clinical geneticist, only limited improvement was found in the activities of GPs to attempt to collect these data. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 149
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Boerma WGW, 1997, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V47, P481
[2]   COMPARISON OF COUPLES REFERRED AND NOT REFERRED FOR GENETIC-COUNSELING IN A GENETIC CLINIC AFTER THE BIRTH OF A CHILD WITH A CONGENITAL ANOMALY - A STUDY IN A POPULATION IN THE NORTHEASTERN NETHERLANDS [J].
CORNEL, MC ;
VANESSEN, AJ ;
TENKATE, LP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1992, 42 (03) :387-392
[3]  
DESMIT DJ, 1992, TIJDSCHR SOC GEZONDH, V70, P411
[4]  
DESMIT DJ, 1997, THESIS VU MED CTR AM
[5]   A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services [J].
Emery, J ;
Watson, E ;
Rose, P ;
Andermann, A .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (04) :426-445
[6]   The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care [J].
Emery, J ;
Hayflick, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7293) :1027-1030
[7]  
Geller G, 1993, Arch Fam Med, V2, P1119, DOI 10.1001/archfami.2.11.1119
[8]  
HIETALA M, 1995, AM J HUM GENET, V56, P1493
[9]   A multidisciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders [J].
Modell, M ;
Wonke, B ;
Anionwu, E ;
Khan, M ;
Tai, SS ;
Lloyd, M ;
Modell, B .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7161) :788-791
[10]   Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care [J].
Rose, P ;
Humm, E ;
Hey, K ;
Jones, L ;
Huson, SM .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (01) :78-83