Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model

被引:403
作者
Steg, Linda [1 ]
de Groot, Judith [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Psychol, Fac Behav & Social Sci, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Psychol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PERSONAL NORM; PROENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR; RECYCLING BEHAVIOR; PROBLEM AWARENESS; HELPING-BEHAVIOR; CAR USE; RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1348/014466609X477745
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper examines factors influencing prosocial intentions. On the basis of the norm activation model (NAM), we propose that four variables influence prosocial intentions or behaviours: ( I) personal norms (PN), reflecting feelings of moral obligation to engage in prosocial behaviour, (2) awareness of adverse consequences of not acting prosocially, (3) ascription of responsibility for the negative consequences of not acting prosocially, and (4) perceived control over the problems. We conducted a series of experimental studies to examine how the NAM variables are causally related. As hypothesized, problem awareness, responsibility, and outcome efficacy played an important role in the development of RN and various types of prosocial intentions in the social as well as environmental domain.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 743
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
[41]   Multiplicative invalidity and its application to complex correlational models [J].
Trafimow, David .
GENETIC SOCIAL AND GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY MONOGRAPHS, 2006, 132 (03) :215-239
[42]   Defensive Denial and High Cost Prosocial Behavior [J].
Tyler, Tom R. ;
Orwin, Robert ;
Schurer, Lisa .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 3 (04) :267-281
[43]  
VANLIERE KD, 1978, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V8, P174
[44]   PREDICTING RECYCLING BEHAVIOR FROM GLOBAL AND SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES AND CHANGES IN RECYCLING OPPORTUNITIES [J].
VINING, J ;
EBREO, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (20) :1580-1607
[45]  
ZUCKERMAN M, 1978, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V36, P498