Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review

被引:274
作者
Gaston, CM
Mitchell, G
机构
[1] Cornford House Surg, Cambridge CB2 4PH, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Discipline Gen Practice, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
decision-making; advanced cancer; participation; systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Patients with advanced, non-curable cancer face difficult decisions on further treatment, where a small increase in survival time must be balanced against: the toxicity of the treatment. If patients want to be involved in these decisions, in keeping with current notions of autonomy and empowerment, they also require to be adequately informed both on the treatments proposed and on their own disease status and prognosis. A systematic review was performed on decision-making and information provision in patients with advanced cancer. Studies of interventions to improve information giving and encourage participation in decision-making were reviewed, including both randomised controlled trials and uncontrolled studies. Almost all patients expressed a desire for full information, but only about two-thirds wished to participate actively in decision-making. Higher educational level, younger age and female sex were predictive of a desire to participate in decision-making. Active decision-making was more common in patients with certain cancers (e.g. breast) than others (e.g. prostate). A number of simple interventions including question prompt sheets, audio-taping of consultations and patient decision aids have been shown to facilitate such involvement. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2252 / 2264
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]   Oncologists' attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: An exploratory study [J].
Baile, WF ;
Lenzi, R ;
Parker, PA ;
Buckman, R ;
Cohen, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (08) :2189-2196
[3]   Treatment decisions in older patients with colorectal cancer: the role of age and multidimensional function [J].
Bailey, C ;
Corner, J ;
Addington-Hall, J ;
Kumar, D ;
Nelson, M ;
Haviland, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2003, 12 (03) :257-262
[4]   Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient [J].
Barry, B ;
Henderson, A .
CANCER NURSING, 1996, 19 (05) :384-391
[5]   Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer [J].
Beaver, K ;
Luker, KA ;
Owens, RG ;
Leinster, SJ ;
Degner, LF ;
Sloan, JA .
CANCER NURSING, 1996, 19 (01) :8-19
[6]  
Beaver Kinta, 1999, Health Expect, V2, P266, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00066.x
[7]  
Bilodeau B A, 1996, Oncol Nurs Forum, V23, P691
[8]   INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING PREFERENCES OF HOSPITALIZED ADULT CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
BLANCHARD, CG ;
LABRECQUE, MS ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLANCHARD, EB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (11) :1139-1145
[9]   Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question asking [J].
Brown, R ;
Butow, PN ;
Boyer, MJ ;
Tattersall, MHN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 80 (1-2) :242-248
[10]   Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial [J].
Brown, RF ;
Butow, P ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (09) :1273-1279