Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review

被引:276
作者
Gaston, CM
Mitchell, G
机构
[1] Cornford House Surg, Cambridge CB2 4PH, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Discipline Gen Practice, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
decision-making; advanced cancer; participation; systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Patients with advanced, non-curable cancer face difficult decisions on further treatment, where a small increase in survival time must be balanced against: the toxicity of the treatment. If patients want to be involved in these decisions, in keeping with current notions of autonomy and empowerment, they also require to be adequately informed both on the treatments proposed and on their own disease status and prognosis. A systematic review was performed on decision-making and information provision in patients with advanced cancer. Studies of interventions to improve information giving and encourage participation in decision-making were reviewed, including both randomised controlled trials and uncontrolled studies. Almost all patients expressed a desire for full information, but only about two-thirds wished to participate actively in decision-making. Higher educational level, younger age and female sex were predictive of a desire to participate in decision-making. Active decision-making was more common in patients with certain cancers (e.g. breast) than others (e.g. prostate). A number of simple interventions including question prompt sheets, audio-taping of consultations and patient decision aids have been shown to facilitate such involvement. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2252 / 2264
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[61]   ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - AN ANNOTATED-BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SCALES AND CHECKLISTS [J].
MOHER, D ;
JADAD, AR ;
NICHOL, G ;
PENMAN, M ;
TUGWELL, P ;
WALSH, S .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1995, 16 (01) :62-73
[62]   Feasibility and effects of decision aids [J].
Molenaar, S ;
Sprangers, MAG ;
Postma-Schuit, FCE ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Noorlander, J ;
Hendriks, J ;
De Haes, HCJM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (01) :112-127
[63]   CHOICE OF SURGERY FOR EARLY BREAST-CANCER - PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE LEVELS OF CLINICAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS AND THEIR HUSBANDS [J].
MORRIS, J ;
ROYLE, GT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (11) :1017-1019
[64]  
Neufeld K R, 1993, Oncol Nurs Forum, V20, P631
[65]   Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: A randomized, double-blind study [J].
Ong, LML ;
Visser, MRM ;
Lammes, FB ;
van der Velden, J ;
Kuenen, BC ;
de Haes, JCJM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (16) :3052-3060
[66]   INFORMED CONSENT FOR INVESTIGATIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY - PATIENTS AND PHYSICIANS PERCEPTIONS [J].
PENMAN, DT ;
HOLLAND, JC ;
BAHNA, GF ;
MORROW, G ;
SCHMALE, AH ;
DEROGATIS, LR ;
CARNRIKE, CL ;
CHERRY, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (07) :849-855
[67]   Treatment decisions in palliative cancer care: Patients' preferences for involvement and doctors' knowledge about it [J].
Rothenbacher, D ;
Lutz, MP ;
Porzsolt, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (08) :1184-1189
[68]   Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: descriptive study based on scripted interviews [J].
Silvestri, G ;
Pritchard, R ;
Welch, HG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7161) :771-775
[69]   Information needs and decisional preferences among women with ovarian cancer [J].
Stewart, DE ;
Wong, F ;
Cheung, AM ;
Dancey, J ;
Meana, M ;
Cameron, JI ;
McAndrews, MP ;
Bunston, T ;
Murphy, J ;
Rosen, B .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 77 (03) :357-361
[70]   Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life [J].
Street, RL ;
Voigt, B .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (03) :298-306