Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists?

被引:485
作者
Hertwig, R
Ortmann, A
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Behav & Cognit, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charles Univ Prague, CERGE EI, Prague 11121 1, Czech Republic
[3] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Prague 11121 1, Czech Republic
关键词
behavioral decision making; cognitive illusions; deception; experimental design; experimental economics; experimental practices; financial incentives; learning; role playing;
D O I
10.1017/S0140525X01004149
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This target article is concerned vith the implications of the surprisingly different experimental practices in economics and in areas of psychology relevant to both economists and psychologists, such as behavioral decision making. We consider four features of experimentation in economics, namely, script enactment, repeated trials, performance-based monetary payments, and the proscription against deception, and compare them to experimental practices in psychology, primarily in the area of behavioral decision making. Whereas economists bring a precisely defined "script" to experiments for participants to enact, psychologists often do not provide such a script, leaving Participants to infer what choices the situation affords. By often using repeated experimental trials, economists allow participants to learn about the tusk and the environment; psychologists typically do not. Economists generally pay participants on the basis of clearly defined performance criteria; psychologists usually pay a flat fee or grant a fixed amount of course credit. Economists virtually never deceive participants; psychologists, especially in some areas of inquiry, often do. We argue that experimental standards in economics are regulatory in that they allow for little variation between the experimental practices of individual researchers. The experimental standards in psychology, by contrast, are comparatively laissez-faire. We believe that the wider range of experimental practices in psychology reflects a lack of procedural regularity that may contribute to the variability of empirical findings in the research fields under consideration. We conclude vith a call for more research on the consequences of methodological preferences, such as the use on monetary payments, and propose a "do-it-both-ways" rule regarding the enactment of scripts, repetition of trials, and performance-based monetary payments. We also argue, on pragmatic grounds, that the default practice should be not to deceive participants.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / +
页数:29
相关论文
共 223 条
[51]   DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS AND 3 CONCEPTIONS OF FREQUENTLY DECEIVED SUBJECT [J].
COOK, TD ;
BEAN, JR ;
CALDER, BJ ;
FREY, R ;
KROVETZ, ML ;
REISMAN, SR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 14 (03) :185-&
[52]   Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty [J].
Cosmides, L ;
Tooby, J .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (01) :1-73
[53]  
Creyer E. H., 1990, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V3, P1, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960030102
[54]  
Danziger K., 1990, CONSTRUCTING SUBJECT, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511524059, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511524059]
[55]   FIELD-DEPENDENCE AND HINDSIGHT BIAS - COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING AND THE GENERATION OF REASONS [J].
DAVIES, MF .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1992, 26 (01) :58-74
[56]  
Davis D. D., 1993, EXPT EC
[58]  
Dawes RM., 1988, RATIONAL CHOICE UNCE
[59]  
Deci E.L., 1999, UNDERMINING EFFECT I
[60]   A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation [J].
Deci, EL ;
Koestner, R ;
Ryan, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (06) :627-668