Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners

被引:41
作者
Goertzen, Andrew L. [1 ,2 ]
Suk, Joon Young [2 ]
Thompson, Christopher J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, John Buhler Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P4, Canada
[2] Montreal Neurol Inst, McConnell Brain Imaging Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
lutetium oxyorthosilicate; intrinsic activity; PET; energy window; small-animal PET;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.107.040584
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO)- or lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO)-based PET scanners have intrinsic radioactivity in the scintillator crystals due to the presence of Lu-176, which decays by beta-emission followed by one or more prompt gamma-ray emissions. This leads to intrinsic true counts that can influence the image when scanning low levels of activity. An evaluation of the effects of this intrinsic activity for low levels of activity and different energy windows is performed on an LSO-based small-animal PET scanner. Methods: Intrinsic count rate and sensitivity were measured for a range of lower-level discriminators (LLDs) ranging from 100 to 750 keV. The noise equivalent count rate (NECR) as a function of LLD for activity levels from 100 Bq to 100 kBq was estimated using a combination of measurement and previously published data for this scanner. Phantom imaging was performed using three Ge-68 sources of strength 55, 220, and 940 Bq and LLD levels of 250, 350, and 400 keV. The images were assessed using a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) analysis and by comparing the observed ratio of source activities to the true ratio value. Results: The intrinsic true count rate is reduced from 940 counts per second (cps) for a 250- to 750-keV energy window to < 2 cps for a 400- to 750-keV window. There is a corresponding 2-fold drop in sensitivity for detected true events for external positron sources for these 2 energy windows. The NECR versus LLD curves showed a highly peaked shape, with the optimum LLD being approximately 425 keV. The phantom image results were dominated by the intrinsic true counts when an energy window of 250-750 keV was used. The intrinsic true counts were almost completely removed by raising the LLD to 400 keV. The CNR for each of the sources was higher for the narrow energy window and the 55 Bq could be easily visualized in images acquired with LLD levels of 350 and 400 keV but not when the 250-keV LLD was used. Images acquired with an LLD of 400 keV and reconstructed with 2-dimensional filtered backprojection were the most quantitatively accurate. Conclusion: It is possible to visualize sources of < 1 kBq in LSO-based animal PET systems by raising the LLD to 400 keV to exclude the majority of the counts due to the intrinsic activity present in the LSO.
引用
收藏
页码:1692 / 1698
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Ex vivo cell labeling with 64Cu-pyruvaldehyde-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) for imaging cell trafficking in mice with positron-emission tomography [J].
Adonai, N ;
Nguyen, KN ;
Walsh, J ;
Iyer, M ;
Toyokuni, T ;
Phelps, ME ;
McCarthy, T ;
McCarthy, DW ;
Gambhir, SS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (05) :3030-3035
[2]  
Browne E., 1998, Nuclear Data Sheets, V84, P337, DOI 10.1006/ndsh.1998.0014
[3]   OPTIMIZATION OF PET INSTRUMENTATION FOR BRAIN ACTIVATION STUDIES [J].
DAHLBOM, M ;
CHERRY, SR ;
ERIKSSON, L ;
HOFFMAN, EJ ;
WIENHARD, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1993, 40 (04) :1048-1054
[4]  
Daube-Witherspoon ME, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1398
[5]   The ECAT HRRT: An example of NEMA scatter estimation issues for LSO-based PET systems [J].
Eriksson, L ;
Watson, CC ;
Wienhard, K ;
Eriksson, M ;
Casey, ME ;
Knoess, C ;
Lenox, M ;
Burbar, Z ;
Conti, M ;
Bendriem, B ;
Heiss, WD ;
Nutt, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2005, 52 (01) :90-94
[6]   From PET detectors to PET scanners [J].
Humm, JL ;
Rosenfeld, A ;
Del Guerra, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (11) :1574-1597
[7]   Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents [J].
Knoess, C ;
Siegel, S ;
Smith, A ;
Newport, D ;
Richerzhagen, R ;
Winkeler, A ;
Jacobs, A ;
Goble, RN ;
Graf, R ;
Wienhard, K ;
Heiss, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (05) :737-747
[8]  
Laforest R, 2004, IEEE NUCL SCI CONF R, P2965
[9]   MEASURING PET SCANNER SENSITIVITY - RELATING COUNTRATES TO IMAGE SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIOS USING NOISE EQUIVALENT COUNTS [J].
STROTHER, SC ;
CASEY, ME ;
HOFFMAN, EJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1990, 37 (02) :783-788
[10]  
Sundaresan G, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1962