Effects of the subtalar sling ankle taping technique on combined talocrural-subtalar joint motions

被引:19
作者
Wilkerson, GB
Kovaleski, JE
Meyer, M
Stawiz, C
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Grad Athlet Training Program, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[3] Benchmark Phys Therapy, Chattanooga, TN USA
[4] Sports Phys Therapy New York, Tonawanda, NY USA
关键词
ankle and subtalar motion; taping technique;
D O I
10.1177/107110070502600310
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The findings of research on the effectiveness of ankle taping for protection against ligament injury have been inconsistent, and the topic remains controversial. The precise orientation of the force vectors created by tension within the various tape strip components of an ankle taping procedure may be a critical factor influencing the degree of motion restraint that is provided. We hypothesized that the addition of the subtalar sling component to the widely recognized standard (Gibney) ankle taping procedure would enhance restraint of ankle motion. This was a controlled laboratory study, with fully repeated measures (subjects served as their own controls). Methods: An ankle arthrometer was used to quantify anteroposterior (AP) translation and frontal plane inversion-eversion (I-E) tilt of the talocrural-subtalar joints under untaped and taped conditions in normal subjects. A 15-minute exercise session was conducted to loosen the tape before measurement of its effect on motion restraint. Results: The ankle taping procedure that incorporated the subtalar sling provided significantly greater restriction of postexercise AP translation (p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.63) and postexercise I-E tilt (p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.66). Conclusions: The subtalar sling ankle taping procedure provides greater restriction of motions associated with ankle instability than the more widely used Gibney procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 246
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Functional properties of adhesive ankle taping: Neuromuscular and mechanical effects before and after exercise [J].
Alt, W ;
Lohrer, H ;
Gollhofer, A .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 20 (04) :238-245
[2]
COTLER JM, 1984, TRAUMATIC DISORDERS, P113
[3]
Is stress radiography necessary in the diagnosis of acute or chronic ankle instability? [J].
Frost, SCL ;
Amendola, A .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 1999, 9 (01) :40-45
[4]
THE MEASURED EFFECT OF TAPING ON COMBINED FOOT AND ANKLE MOTION BEFORE AND AFTER EXERCISE [J].
FUMICH, RM ;
ELLISON, AE ;
GUERIN, GJ ;
GRACE, PD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1981, 9 (03) :165-170
[5]
Gibney VP, 1895, NY MED J, V61, P193
[6]
COMPARISON OF DONJOY ANKLE LIGAMENT PROTECTOR AND SUBTALAR SLING ANKLE TAPING IN RESTRICTING FOOT AND ANKLE MOTION BEFORE AND AFTER EXERCISE [J].
GROSS, MT ;
BATTEN, AM ;
LAMM, AL ;
LORREN, JL ;
STEVENS, JJ ;
DAVIS, JM ;
WILKERSON, GB .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 19 (01) :33-41
[7]
HEIT EJ, 1996, J SPORT REHABIL, V5, P206
[8]
HOLLIS JM, 1995, AM J SPORT MED, V23, P672
[9]
Reliability of intratester and intertester measurements derived from an instrumented ankle arthrometer [J].
Hubbard, TJ ;
Kovaleski, JE ;
Kaminski, TW .
JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2003, 12 (03) :208-220
[10]
IRVIN R, 1997, SPORTS MED PREVENTIO, P59